2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10472-010-9186-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometry of relative plausibility and relative belief of singletons

Abstract: The study of the interplay between belief and probability can be posed in a geometric framework, in which belief and plausibility functions are represented as points of simplices in a Cartesian space. Probability approximations of belief functions form two homogeneous groups, which we call "affine" and "epistemic" families. In this paper we focus on relative plausibility, belief, and uncertainty of probabilities of singletons, the "epistemic" family. They form a coherent collection of probability transformatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the barycenter of the credal set P[b] associated with b. Although other transforms have been proposed [45], [48], [46], [47], empirically their performances in the human pose estimation experiments presented here have been proven comparable. C. Assessing evidential models 1) Robustness: as a consequence of computing the belief estimate by conjunctive combination, a non-zero mass may be assigned to the empty set.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…is the barycenter of the credal set P[b] associated with b. Although other transforms have been proposed [45], [48], [46], [47], empirically their performances in the human pose estimation experiments presented here have been proven comparable. C. Assessing evidential models 1) Robustness: as a consequence of computing the belief estimate by conjunctive combination, a non-zero mass may be assigned to the empty set.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The geometry of the relationship between measures of different kinds has also been extensively studied [50,30,17,31], with particular attention to the problem of transforming a belief function into a classical probability measure [9,112,99] (see Section 3). One can distinguish between an affine family of probability transformations [20] (those which commute with affine combination in the belief space), and an epistemic family of transforms [19], formed by the relative belief and relative plausibility of singletons [28,27,37,46,33], which possess dual properties with respect to Dempster's sum [24]. The problem of finding the possibility measure which best approximates a given belief function [2] can also be approached in geometric terms [29,47,39,40].…”
Section: The Geometry Of Uncertainty Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…plausibility of singletons and belief of singletons, respectively [27,24,33,37], for sake of consistency of nomenclature. However, P l is traditionally referred to as the contour function.…”
Section: Justification For the Namementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry of the relationship between measures of different kinds has also been extensively studied [51,31,18,32], with particular attention to the problem of transforming a belief function into a classical probability measure [11,142,129]. One can distinguish between an 'affine' family of probability transformations [21] (those which commute with affine combination in the belief space), and an 'epistemic' family of transforms [20], formed by the relative belief and relative plausibility of singletons [28,29,38,47,34], which possess dual properties with respect to Dempster's sum [25]. Semantics for the main probability transforms can be provided in terms of credal sets, i.e., convex sets of probabilities [32].…”
Section: Geometry Approach To Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%