2020
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GeoMine: interactive pattern mining of protein–ligand interfaces in the Protein Data Bank

Abstract: Summary The searching of user-defined 3D queries in molecular interfaces is a computationally challenging problem that is not satisfactorily solved so far. Most of the few existing tools focused on that purpose are desktop based and not openly available. Besides that, they show a lack of query versatility, search efficiency, and user-friendliness. We address this issue with GeoMine, a publicly available web application that provides textual, numerical, and geometrical search functionality for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An unsuccessful pocket identification is especially obstructive if the druggability of specific binding sites is to be analyzed or the detection method is used to define the dimensions of, e.g., a fragment-bound binding site for molecular docking and fragment growing. The same holds for developing binding site databases for automated pocket comparisons, e.g., with GeoMine. , In these cases, DoGSite3 enables the user to annotate the DoGSite grid based on given reference ligands, ensuring the detection of pockets in the proximity of the reference ligands and allowing for analyses of binding sites that are difficult to detect. If this modification is applied for the druggable binding sites as stored in the scPDB, 99.0% of the binding sites are included with a ligand coverage of at least 80% as compared to 76.4% if this ligand bias option is not enabled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unsuccessful pocket identification is especially obstructive if the druggability of specific binding sites is to be analyzed or the detection method is used to define the dimensions of, e.g., a fragment-bound binding site for molecular docking and fragment growing. The same holds for developing binding site databases for automated pocket comparisons, e.g., with GeoMine. , In these cases, DoGSite3 enables the user to annotate the DoGSite grid based on given reference ligands, ensuring the detection of pockets in the proximity of the reference ligands and allowing for analyses of binding sites that are difficult to detect. If this modification is applied for the druggable binding sites as stored in the scPDB, 99.0% of the binding sites are included with a ligand coverage of at least 80% as compared to 76.4% if this ligand bias option is not enabled.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previous studies, researchers always focus on such proteins that can form compounds or have structures 55 , 56 , 57 . Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We usually will focus on such proteins that can form compounds or have structures, since they are very useful for pharmacological and pharmacochemical research 55 , 56 , 57 . Here, we define the ratios for compounds (Ratio_c) and structures (Ratio_s) to help us to show the distribution of these types of proteins in MCDB.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires comprehensive search capabilities. With GeoMine ( 5 , 6 ), we have developed a search engine that allows for the generation of and the search for atom-based geometric query patterns and an extensive textual and numerical filtering of the PDB. The query atoms can be described manually or automatically with varying degrees of detail, from major properties like the corresponding molecule type, i.e.…”
Section: Materials and Methods: Extensions And Novel Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%