2020
DOI: 10.1002/esp.4822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomorphic process signatures reshaping sub‐humid Mediterranean badlands: 2. Application to 5‐year dataset

Abstract: Badland landscapes exhibit high erosion rates and represent the main source of fine sediments in some catchments. Advances in high‐resolution topographic methods allow analysis of topographic changes at high temporal and spatial scales. We apply the Mapping Geomorphic Processes in the Environment (MaGPiE) algorithm to infer the main geomorphic process signatures operating in two sub‐humid badlands with contrasting morphometric attributes located in the Southern Pyrenees. By interrogating a 5‐year dataset of se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The datasets that result may provide a better means of calibrating and validating models of sediment transport in gullies (Fu et al, 2005;Gordon et al, 2007). It is possible that we can use the derived sediment transport fields to understand the spatial structure of sediment transport and to relate this to distinct geomorphic process signatures (e.g., Llena et al, 2020) and the space-time evolution in within gully sediment connection (Heckmann & Vericat, 2018) and ultimately to test and to refine sediment connectivity indices (e.g., Cavalli et al, 2013). The data can also be used to produce spatially-explicit sediment delivery ratios (Heckmann & Vericat, 2018) and to describe how these evolve through time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The datasets that result may provide a better means of calibrating and validating models of sediment transport in gullies (Fu et al, 2005;Gordon et al, 2007). It is possible that we can use the derived sediment transport fields to understand the spatial structure of sediment transport and to relate this to distinct geomorphic process signatures (e.g., Llena et al, 2020) and the space-time evolution in within gully sediment connection (Heckmann & Vericat, 2018) and ultimately to test and to refine sediment connectivity indices (e.g., Cavalli et al, 2013). The data can also be used to produce spatially-explicit sediment delivery ratios (Heckmann & Vericat, 2018) and to describe how these evolve through time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors thank Prof. Stuart Lane, acting as editor‐in‐chief of the journal Earth Surface Processes and Landforms , his suggestion of considering the research paper submitted by Llena et al . () where the MaGPiE algorithm is applied to a five years dataset and this one as a paper pair or two connected papers. Finally, we thank all comments and suggestions received from two anonymous referees and from the associate editor and the editor‐in‐chief of Earth Surface Processes and Landforms .…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the authors also thank the British Society for Geomorphology to support the long-term geomorphological monitoring programme in the experimental badland that started in 2013; and the members of the Fluvial Dynamics Research Group for their assistance during the fieldwork campaigns. The authors thank Prof. Stuart Lane, acting as editor-in-chief of the journal Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, his suggestion of considering the research paper submitted by Llena et al (2020) where the MaGPiE algorithm is applied to a five years dataset and this one as a paper pair or two connected papers. Finally, we thank all comments and suggestions received from two anonymous referees and from the associate editor and the editor-in-chief of Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RTK-GNSS and TLS datasets in the current research represent control data to examine the precision of the various mobile sensing platforms and their ability to capture the morphometry and topographic complexity in our field site. The findings presented herein provide insights into cost–benefit of purchasing various sUAS and sensors, precision of the sensors across a gradient of complex terrain, and their ability to capture high-definition topography, which is a fundamental boundary condition in numerical and physical modeling experiments [ 13 ] as well as change detection [ 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%