2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomorphometric analysis for characterizing landforms in Morelos State, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Terrain features can be described and categorized into simple topographic relief elements or units by parameterizing DEMs (Bolongaro-Crevenna et al, 2005). Using geomorphometric parameters (slope, aspect, azimuth, concavity/convexity, etc.)…”
Section: Digital Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Terrain features can be described and categorized into simple topographic relief elements or units by parameterizing DEMs (Bolongaro-Crevenna et al, 2005). Using geomorphometric parameters (slope, aspect, azimuth, concavity/convexity, etc.)…”
Section: Digital Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, using only relative slope gradients as a geomorphometric parameter, Yong et al (2008) demonstrated that the same parameters used for Pakistan are applicable for a firstapproximation of geomorphology in other regions that have distinctively different depositional environments, such as Turkey and Mozambique. Geomorphometry also offers a variety of additional approaches for defining terrain units, such as the classification of terrain feature parameters, filter- ing techniques, cluster analysis, and multivariate statistics (Pike, 2002;Bolongaro-Crevenna et al, 2005).…”
Section: Digital Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar scheme was put forward by Dikau [24] and modified by Wood [14]. These classification schemes havesometimes in adapted or extended form -often been applied to derive both crisp [25,26,27,28] and fuzzy [29,30] classifications. Wood [14] proposed multi-scale classification which was extended into fuzzy multi-scale classification based on a range of crisp classifications at different scales [2].…”
Section: Describing Landscapes In Terms Of Surface Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated and semi-automated terrain analysis from the Digital Elevation Models (DEM) has become widely used in geomorphological researches and landform classifications during recent years. Landform features as physical constituents of terrain has been extracted from DEMs using various approaches including combination of geomorphometric parameters (Dikau 1989, Iwahashi, Pike 2007, fuzzy logic and unsupervised classification (Irvin et al 1997, Burrough et al 2000, Adediran et al 2004, supervised classification (Brown et al 1998, Hengl, Rossiter 2003, Prima et al 2006, probabilistic clustering algorithms (Stepinski, Vilalta 2005), multivariate descriptive statistics (Evans 1972, Dikau 1989, Dehn et al 2001, double ternary diagram classification (Crevenna et al 2005), object-oriented image analysis (Dragut, Blaschke 2006) and artificial neural networks (Ehsani, Quiel 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%