2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12371-019-00394-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomorphosites Assessment Methods: Comparative Analysis and Typology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
60
0
8

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
60
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Vujičić et al [22] assessed scientific and educational values together (using four indicators: rarity, representativeness, knowledge of geoscientific issues and level of interpretation). Other researchers included educational value as one sub-indicator of scientific value [64,65]. In our study, scientific and educational values were considered as one value of geosites, similar to Vujičić et al [22], and will hereafter be called scientific value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, Vujičić et al [22] assessed scientific and educational values together (using four indicators: rarity, representativeness, knowledge of geoscientific issues and level of interpretation). Other researchers included educational value as one sub-indicator of scientific value [64,65]. In our study, scientific and educational values were considered as one value of geosites, similar to Vujičić et al [22], and will hereafter be called scientific value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These authors have placed the emphasis on the importance quantitative evaluation of geomorphosites in order to increase the objectivity of the selection. Parametric methods are more objective, using numerically quantified criteria and making it possible to obtain clear and replicable results (Coratza and Giusti 2005;Pereira and Pereira 2010;Mucivuna et al 2019). Unfortunately, the qualitative method of Responsible Editor: Stefan Grab This paper was selected from the 2nd Conference of the Arabian Journal of Geosciences (CAJG), Tunisia 2019 geomorphosite selection still remains the most used method even if it implies a high degree of subjectivity, and the selection criteria are not always well explained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important element in the assessment frame is to select the elements and criteria for evaluation. Many research have introduced the criteria in each study; however, the criteria and parameters used in the methods are often unclear and ambiguous (Mucivuna et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%