1984
DOI: 10.1016/0264-3707(84)90020-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical characteristics of the Namaqua-Natal Belt and its boundaries, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The NamaquaNatal Belt is distinguished by characteristic elongate, high-amplitude and craton-parallel anomalies that continue into western Dronning Maud Land (Corner and Groenewald 1991;Golynsky and Jacobs 2001). An especially large feature is the Beattie anomaly, interpreted to represent a large body of mafic rocks (De Beer and Meyer 1983), although drilling has not yet revealed any mafic rocks (Moyes, personal communication). Possibly, this anomaly points to the remnants of the ocean that closed during the collision of Kalahari with Laurentia and could thus represent the suture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The NamaquaNatal Belt is distinguished by characteristic elongate, high-amplitude and craton-parallel anomalies that continue into western Dronning Maud Land (Corner and Groenewald 1991;Golynsky and Jacobs 2001). An especially large feature is the Beattie anomaly, interpreted to represent a large body of mafic rocks (De Beer and Meyer 1983), although drilling has not yet revealed any mafic rocks (Moyes, personal communication). Possibly, this anomaly points to the remnants of the ocean that closed during the collision of Kalahari with Laurentia and could thus represent the suture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In previous models, the southernmost boundary of the NNMB was defined by a deep BMA (serpentinised ophiolite wedge in Figure 10a) and the Southern Cape Conductive Belt, possibly abutting a Pan African (Neoproterozoic) suture zone beneath the Cape Supergroup (e.g. de Beer et al, 1982;de Beer and Meyer, 1983;1984;Pitts et al, 1992;Eglington et al, 1993;Cornell et al, 2006;Eglington, 2006). The seismic data do not support these models: In our model, the top of the NNMB reflections ( Figure 9) are truncated by a major angular unconformity at 5 km depth in the north, dipping to 12 km depth in the south and traceable along the full profile length.…”
Section: Extent Of the Nnmb Mid-crustmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…de Beer et al, 1982;de Beer and Meyer, 1983;Hälbich, 1993; Figure 10a). In contrast, the new data show that the BMA appears to be confined to the gneisses of the NNMB mid-crust and can therefore not be a Neoproterozoic suture zone.…”
Section: Deep Crustal Profile Southern Karoo Basin and Beattie Magnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying the different spreading directions and velocities of AFR and SAM, this breakup model implies no strike slip along the EE during the drift period. For the initial position of AFR relative to ANT we considered two pronounced magnetic anomalies along the Cape Fold Belt (Figure 7a, Beattie-A) and in DML (Figure 7a, western part of SKA) to be a continuous prebreakup feature [De Beer and Meyer, 1983;Corner and Groenewald, 1991;Golynsky and Aleshkova, 2000]. The Beattie Anomaly in southern Africa has a strike length of approximately 900 km.…”
Section: Antarctica-africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its counter piece in Antarctica has a similar signature in terms of amplitude (100 -900 nT), wavelength, and strike length (>600 km). The age of the Beattie Anomaly is unknown, and speculations range from 500 Ma (Cape orogeny ) to a Grenville age [De Beer and Meyer, 1983;Corner and Groenewald, 1991]. Both features may belong to the Namaqua-Natal-Maud Belt, which can be partly mapped in southern Africa and Dronning Maud Land.…”
Section: Antarctica-africamentioning
confidence: 99%