“…Different geophysical techniques have provided a non-invasive or minimally invasive approach to view pedolith variations down to the saprolith and bedrock interface (e.g., Parsekian et al, 2015). Whereas high-frequency GPR has proven suitable for investigating pedolith layering and thickness (e.g., Doolittle et al, 2007;Gerber et al, 2010;Roering et al, 2010;Dal Bo et al, 2019), other methods such as seismics (e.g., Holbrook et al, 2014), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT, e.g., Braun et al, 2009), and low-frequency GPR (e.g., Aranha et al, 2002) are better suited to image saprolith and bedrock interfaces (e.g., Parsekian et al, 2015). GPR methods were also previously used to indirectly measure water flow (e.g., Zhang et al, 2014;Guo et al, 2020) as well as root density (e.g., Hruska et al, 1999;Guo et al, 2013).…”