2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical modelling of the central Skellefte district, Northern Sweden; an integrated model based on the electrical, potential field and petrophysical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Tavakoli et al . ). The success of this campaign in detecting three highly conductive zones (Tavakoli et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Tavakoli et al . ). The success of this campaign in detecting three highly conductive zones (Tavakoli et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The success of this campaign in detecting three highly conductive zones (Tavakoli et al . ) and the high demand to target the ore at greater depths was the main motivation for conducting the new 2010 geoelectrical/IP field work to study the ore‐hosting structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical property measurements are essential to constrain geophysical inversions (e.g., Spicer et al, 2011;Tavakoli et al, 2012), or to generate mineral prospectivity maps (e.g., Hayward et al, 2013). Density and magnetic susceptibility help discriminate between different lithologies, especially when combined with geochemical data (Ross et al, 2013; this study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The resistivities of these rocks are very variable. Tavakoli et al (2012) performed petrophysical measurements on various rocks from the central Skellefte district to which the site is belonging, and they found that felsic volcanic rocks had a median resistivity of 11,550 Xm with a standard deviation of 17,319 Xm and sulphide ores had a median resistivity of 5,804 Xm with a standard deviation of 13,041 Xm. Profile 1 in Fig.…”
Section: Integrity Of the Sealing Layermentioning
confidence: 99%