2010
DOI: 10.1002/arp.387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical prospection of the frontiers of the Roman Empire in southern Germany, UNESCO World Heritage Site

Abstract: The Roman Limeswith alength of 550 kmisthelargest archaeologicalsite of Europe aswellasthelargest monument of the Roman period. In July 2005 it was decided that the Limes and its interrelated archaeological sites, together with Hadrian's Wall in England, would be a component of a 'Trans-National World Heritage Site' taking the name 'Frontiers of the Roman Empire' . From that point it was necessary to minimize and/or to avoid archaeological excavation. Further research on such sitesismainlylimitedtotheapplicati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the presence of subsoil archeological features in arable fields can substantially increase crop production. This is consistent with results reported by other authors using aerial photographs of cropmarks for the identification of subsoil archeological features (Featherstone et al 1999;Hašek and Kovárník 1999;Challis et al 2009;Gallo et al 2009;Gojda and John 2009;Fassbinder 2010). The high density of subsoil archeological features in the lowlands of Central Europe (see Gojda 2004;Hejcman and Smrž 2010) is thus responsible for an indispensable proportion of spatial variability in crop production, although this variability has never been investigated previously.…”
Section: Wheat Growth Propertiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This indicates that the presence of subsoil archeological features in arable fields can substantially increase crop production. This is consistent with results reported by other authors using aerial photographs of cropmarks for the identification of subsoil archeological features (Featherstone et al 1999;Hašek and Kovárník 1999;Challis et al 2009;Gallo et al 2009;Gojda and John 2009;Fassbinder 2010). The high density of subsoil archeological features in the lowlands of Central Europe (see Gojda 2004;Hejcman and Smrž 2010) is thus responsible for an indispensable proportion of spatial variability in crop production, although this variability has never been investigated previously.…”
Section: Wheat Growth Propertiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Stone buildings have been constructed since the 13th century when the structure of contemporary settlements was established in the Czech Republic, thus ruins of stone buildings cannot be recorded in the sub-soil of contemporary arable fields. This highly contrasts with areas of the former Roman Empire, and Provinces where stone buildings were frequently constructed and therefore negative cropmarks on field crops can be recorded more frequently (see Evans and Jones, 1977;Doneus, 2001;Hanson and Oltean, 2003;Fassbinder, 2010;Verhoeven and Schmitt, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The geophysics followed the excavation, reversed from the usual order, which did not allow the excavation to benefit from the geophysics. As was shown by Fassbinder (2010) for Roman forts, this approach can still provide useful complementary pictures of a site, and additional information that could be used by any future exca- es over a total area of 150 m 2 , the largest of which had an area of 60 m 2 . The trenches revealed a wall at least 100 m long, perhaps as long as 180 m, although interior architecture was not clear.…”
Section: Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Procedures developed at the Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege by Helmut Becker (1999Becker ( , 2008 and Jörg Fassbinder (2010) were used. The area of 160x120 m (ª2 ha) was surveyed in 40x40 m grids, with some odd spaces being filled in by other grid sizes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation