2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geophysical prospection of the Roman city of Pollentia, Alcúdia (Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Ranieri et al . ). Numerous recent studies, however, have used terrestrial laser scan (TLS) and photogrammetry techniques at archaeological and architectural heritage sites to aid documentation, assessment, modelling, monitoring, management and preservation planning (El‐Hakim et al .…”
Section: Gpr and Laser‐scan Acquisition And Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Ranieri et al . ). Numerous recent studies, however, have used terrestrial laser scan (TLS) and photogrammetry techniques at archaeological and architectural heritage sites to aid documentation, assessment, modelling, monitoring, management and preservation planning (El‐Hakim et al .…”
Section: Gpr and Laser‐scan Acquisition And Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…GPR is increasingly being used as a non-destructive testing method and subsurface imaging technique for the evaluation of structural integrity, geometry, configuration and physical properties of industrial transportation and civil infrastructure resources (Saarenketo 2009), geological features and archaeology at cultural heritage structures (Pérez-Grarcia et al 2013;Santos-Assunçao et al 2014;Ranieri et al 2016). Numerous recent studies, however, have used terrestrial laser scan (TLS) and photogrammetry techniques at archaeological and architectural heritage sites to aid documentation, assessment, modelling, monitoring, management and preservation planning (El-Hakim et al 2007;Pavlidis et al 2007;Alkheder, Al-shawabkh and Haala 2009;Domingo et al 2013;Núñez, Buill and Edo 2013;Tapete et al 2013;Yang, Xu and Neumann 2014;Castellazzi et al 2015;Constanzo et al 2015;Hakonen, Kuusela and Okkonen 2015;Jaklič et al 2015;Plisson and Zotkina 2015; Altunas, Yildiz and Scaioni 2016 -amongst many others), but less frequently in conjunction with other near-surface geophysical data (Entwistle, MCCaffrey and Abrahams 2009;Lubowiecka et al, 2009Lubowiecka et al, , 2011Rogers 2014;Watters and Wilkes 2014).…”
Section: G P R a N D L A S E R -S C A N A C Q U I S I T I O N A N D Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include portable XRF (X-ray fluourescence) analyzers [9], ultrasonic testing [10], etc. In structural applications (for feature detection and resolution of targets larger than a few centimeters) methods like GPR, magnetometry, and photogrammetry are common [10][11][12]. These methods have the potential to provide information about a structure, ranging from the composition of pigment layers in paintings [9] to the mapping of foundation walls [12].…”
Section: Nondestructive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical resistivity prospection specifically proved to be an effective method to characterize the subsoil and materials in various fields of study, such as applied geology [2][3][4], hydrogeology [5,6], engineering [7][8][9], environmental sciences [10,11], and agriculture [12][13][14]. This method is widely used for archaeological surveys: many past research has shown that the variations of electrical resistivity are often related to walls, floorings, paving and burials [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. These structures are generally characterized by different electrical properties compared to the geological layers that, over time, have buried them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrated prospection with complementary geophysical methods permits to better define the physical model of the investigated subsoil [49]. One of the most integrated approaches in archaeology is the combination of electrical and Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) methods [19,50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%