Two traverses across the Coast batholith from Haines, Alaska, to Bennett, BritishColumbia (Skagway traverse), and from Ketchikan, Alaska, to Hyder, British Columbia (Ketchikan traverse), indicate the following general features.(1) The batholith sutures, or stitches, Taku, Alexander, and Stikine terranes, which consist largely of tectonically thickened Paleozoic to Jurassic oceanic, volcanic, flyschoid, and carbonate rocks; cratonic rocks are absent.(2) The batholith consists of discrete units or suites, episodically emplaced: the Skagway traverse shows western tonalitic gneiss (57 to 70 percent SiC>2, 68[?] Ma), central massive tonalite (59 to 71 percent Si(>2, 54 Ma) and minor tonalitic gneiss, and eastern massive granite (74 to 77 percent SiC>2, 52 to 48 Ma); the Ketchikan traverse shows western foliated tonalite (55 to 58 percent SiC>2,55 to 57 Ma), central migmatitic dioritic to tonalitic gneiss (50 to 64 percent S1O2, ca. 127 Ma), and eastern massive granodiorite and granite (61 to 71 percent SiC>2,54 to 52 Ma). (3) Emplacement of the batholith was syn-to post-accretionary and coeval with subduction. (4) Most rocks are calc-alkalic, have moderate contents of K, high Sr, low Rb, and mildly enriched light rare earth elements (REE), except that minor high-Si02 granite of the Skagway traverse shows low Sr and moderate Rb; on the Qz-Or-(Ab+An) normative plot, compositions lie between high-Al basalt and the trondhjemitegranodiorite-granite field; initial ^Sr/^Sr ratios (SIR) are 0.7049-0.7060 (Skagway) and 0.7046-0.7066 (Ketchikan); initial 143 Nd/ 144 Nd ratios (NIR) are 0.51229-0.51240 (Ketchikan). Polarity of SIR are only found in the Ketchikan traverse, where western foliated tonalites have higher values than eastern granodiorite and granite. West of the batholith, 93-to 89-Ma tonalite and granodiorite intruded Taku terrane and is chemically similar (60 to 67 percent SiC>2) to that of the batholith, but is isotopically and mineralogically distinct. Proposed origins for the various suites of plutons are consistent in both traverses with their position relative to the migmatitic gneisses. Most massive plutons to the east of the gneisses in both traverses probably formed by fractionation of subduction-related high-Al tholeiite coupled by mixing with melts from metamorphosed mafic to siliceous igneous rocks and flysch of Mesozoic to Paleozoic age. A few smaller high-Si(>2 granite bodies may be largely melt of flysch or siliceous igneous rocks. Foliated tonalitic plutons to the west of the mignatites (Ketchikan traverse) display less subduction component and may have formed by melting of the mafic parts of the Mesozoic migmatitic gneiss.