2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geopolymers based on spent catalyst residue from a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
44
0
19

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
44
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…1), are also observed in the alkaliactivated pastes, suggesting that these phases are not participating in the activation reaction to any notable extent. This is consistent with the observations in fly ash based geopolymers, where mullite and quartz are also identified as unreactive compounds (19), and the results of Rodríguez et al (15) in alkali-activated specimens based on a Spanish SFCC material. In samples formulated with an Na 2 O/SiO 2 ratio of 0.20 (Fig.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1), are also observed in the alkaliactivated pastes, suggesting that these phases are not participating in the activation reaction to any notable extent. This is consistent with the observations in fly ash based geopolymers, where mullite and quartz are also identified as unreactive compounds (19), and the results of Rodríguez et al (15) in alkali-activated specimens based on a Spanish SFCC material. In samples formulated with an Na 2 O/SiO 2 ratio of 0.20 (Fig.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Preliminary work activating SFCC catalysts to form geopolymers (14,15) showed good mechanical strength in the activated SFCC specimens. This was attributed to the dissolution of the zeolite phases in the spent catalyst, promoting the formation of a crosslinked aluminosilicate type gel (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These materials have an increasing interest in scientific and technological fields, and they are an excellent alternative to the extensive usage of OPC. Compared to OPC, they are more sustainable and have less environmental footprint, as well as, the required energy to be manufactured is less, generating between 60 and 80 % less CO 2 emissions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, geopolymer can be formulated using a silicate or aluminosilicate as precursors, while alkaline sources can include any soluble substance supplying alkali metal cations, raise the pH of the mixture of reaction, and accelerate the dissolution of the solid precursor (such as alkali hydroxides, silicates, carbonates, sulfates or aluminates). There are several research studies on geopolymers which used a wide variety of waste materials for their formulation: metallurgical slag, fly ash from thermal power, red mud from aluminum industry, ash from rice husk combustion, vanadium mining waste, ashes from palm oil, waste from ceramic and glass industry, among others [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Their properties depend on the composition of these secondary sources and on the used alkaline ion, and especially, on the polycondensation conditions reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%