2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10050291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geospatial Analysis of Solar Energy in Riyadh Using a GIS-AHP-Based Technique

Abstract: In recent years, spatial multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been applied to different types of spatial problems, such as solar power site suitability. MCDA can be used to support the process of identifying suitable regions for solar energy projects. To the best of our knowledge, no study has addressed the problem of site evaluation for solar photovoltaic PV systems in the Riyadh region. Therefore, a spatial MCDA framework is proposed to perform a geospatial analysis of solar energy in the Riyadh regio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our literature review, the fuzzy AHP (FAHP) method is also used in many studies, but its weakness is that it is affected by stakeholder preferences. In addition, the FAHP is a very complex method that requires more numerical calculations than the AHP (Albraheem & Alabdulkarim, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our literature review, the fuzzy AHP (FAHP) method is also used in many studies, but its weakness is that it is affected by stakeholder preferences. In addition, the FAHP is a very complex method that requires more numerical calculations than the AHP (Albraheem & Alabdulkarim, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the analytic hierarchy process is widely used in various fields due to its simple operation and concise system. For example, it is used for collaborative evaluation in the company's operation management [26]; in software-defined networks, it is used for controller selection [27]; in the design of urban tourism routes, it is used to evaluate tourism resources [28]; it is used to evaluate the importance of active power in research [29]; it is also employed to select the most suitable city when solving spatial problems [30], etc. However, the analytic hierarchy process also has its shortcomings that it cannot solve the comprehensive evaluation problem of multi-person decision-making conflicts.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When calculating the degree of relevance, the existence of normal random numbers would also make the result of the calculation not unique, so it was necessary to calculate the expected value E rx and entropy E rn of the comprehensive evaluation score after multiple operations [30]. The calculation formula is as shown in Equations ( 17) and ( 18):…”
Section: Determine the Security Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reasonably plan and use the MCDA, the various criteria contributing to the decision-making process have to be ranked and weighted, as per their relevance and importance [20]. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [24], [25] has recently become attractive as a sufficient MCDA tool with potential for various uses [15], [26]- [35]. Interestingly, combining the AHP with a GIS platform leads to optimizing a site-specific seismic design and planning [36], [37], as well as enhancing the scope of conventional hazard assessment maps [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%