2020
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.10.0201004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geospatial variations in trends of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition indicators at block level in Bihar, India, during scale-up of Ananya program interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work is the latest in a series of analyses aimed to describe and explain the Ananya programme's impacts in Bihar [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][36][37][38][39]. Our intention was not to re-examine the already well-established links between health and social determinants, but to examine how these links are influencing the outcome of the programme scaleup over time and in different areas, and the need for approaches to be more conscious of the existing ecosystem in which health programmes are embedded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This work is the latest in a series of analyses aimed to describe and explain the Ananya programme's impacts in Bihar [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][36][37][38][39]. Our intention was not to re-examine the already well-established links between health and social determinants, but to examine how these links are influencing the outcome of the programme scaleup over time and in different areas, and the need for approaches to be more conscious of the existing ecosystem in which health programmes are embedded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology was described in detail elsewhere [ 13 ]. We previously estimated block-level trends with 95% credible intervals for each indicator using hierarchical Bayesian modelling [ 19 ]. For the first research question, we defined an increase in indicator level as a 95% lower credible limit that was above 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations