2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-008-1322-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistical analysis of spatiotemporal variability of groundwater level fluctuations in Amman–Zarqa basin, Jordan: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the presented results are in good agreement with previous data [1,5,6,[13][14][15][16][17]33]. In average all these studies stated an annual groundwater level drawdown in the order of 0.65 m to 2.0 m. Figure 5a shows the linear trend from GRACE adjusted terrestrial water storage (including soil moisture and vegetation changes) during January 2003 to July 2014.…”
Section: Well Datasupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the presented results are in good agreement with previous data [1,5,6,[13][14][15][16][17]33]. In average all these studies stated an annual groundwater level drawdown in the order of 0.65 m to 2.0 m. Figure 5a shows the linear trend from GRACE adjusted terrestrial water storage (including soil moisture and vegetation changes) during January 2003 to July 2014.…”
Section: Well Datasupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The Jordanian part of Amman Zarqa Basin ( Figure 1) covers an area of 3739 km 2 compared to 310 km 2 in Syria [1]. This basin represents the transitional area between western hills and eastern desert.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, a technique often used in earth sciences and especially in hydrogeology is kriging (Cressie, 1990;Rouhani and Myers, 1990;Weber and Englung, 1994;Zimmerman et al, 1999;Brochu and Marcotte, 2003;Theodossiou and Latinopoulos, 2006;Lyon et al, 2006;Ahmadi and Sedghamiz, 2007;Abedini et al, 2008;Renard and Jeannée, 2008;Ta'any et al, 2009;Buchanan and Triantafilis, 2009;Pardo-Igúzquiza et al, 2009;Sun et al, 2009;Canoğlu and Kurtuluş, 2017). A few authors have compared the efficiency of different interpolation techniques with kriging, cokriging, and kriging with external drift (Hoeksema et al, 1989;Boezio et al, 2006;Pardo-Igúzquiza and Chica-Olmo, 2007;Ahmadi and Sedghamiz, 2008;Bargaoui and Chebbi, 2008).…”
Section: Experimental Site and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical semivariogram ( ) (h  ) is defined as half the average quadratic difference between two observations of a variable separated by a distance vector h [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, kriging provides the estimation variance at every estimated point, which is an indicator of the accuracy of the estimated value. This is considered as the major advantage of kriging over other estimation techniques [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%