geoENV VI – Geostatistics for Environmental Applications
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6448-7_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistical Applications of Spartan Spatial Random Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consideration of various parametric covariance models may not be necessary in the SSRF framework, since the four-parameter SSRF covariance function is sufficiently flexible to capture different spatial patterns (Hristopulos 2003;Elogne and Hristopulos 2006c) within a statistically homogeneous domain. An automatic mapping system should test the assumption of statistical homogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consideration of various parametric covariance models may not be necessary in the SSRF framework, since the four-parameter SSRF covariance function is sufficiently flexible to capture different spatial patterns (Hristopulos 2003;Elogne and Hristopulos 2006c) within a statistically homogeneous domain. An automatic mapping system should test the assumption of statistical homogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensions of these formulas for irregular sampling networks using kernel functions are given in Elogne and Hristopulos (2006a). After the Spartan parameters are estimated, spatial interpolation of the field at unobserved locations can be accomplished by means of the following procedures: (1) using classical kriging methods in conjunction with the corresponding Spartan dependence structure, e.g., (Elogne and Hristopulos 2006c); (2) using the idea of local low energy estimators (Hristopulos 2006) or (3) by means of the SSRF mode predictor (Hristopulos and Elogne 2006b). The first method only differs from the classical approach in the covariance function used.…”
Section: The Ssrf Model Of Spatial Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, in its current formulation DGC is more useful for smooth data distributions, such as the ones studied herein. For noisy data, improvements can be made by developing directional kernel-based estimators for the square gradient and curvature in the spirit of (Elogne & Hristopulos, 2008;Hristopulos & Elogne, 2009) or by incorporating an initial filtering stage to reduce noise (Brownrigg, 1984;Yin, 1996). DGC does not rely on assumptions about the probability distribution of the data, it is reasonably efficient computationally, and it requires very little user input (i.e., the number of simulation runs, the number of class levels and the size of the maximum stencil for initial state selection).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we obtain space-time covariances from the equation that governs the motion of the STRF realizations. Based on (11) and (26)…”
Section: Covariance Function From Langevin Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%