2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geotechnical behaviour of clay soil mixed with rubber waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reductions reported for the OMC have been mainly ascribed to the TDA material's hydrophobic character and hence its lower water adsorption-retention capacity (being mainly less than 4%) compared with that of the fine soil particles, particularly clays [16]. It should be mentioned that, while the reported results for the MDUW are fairly consistent, a limited number of studies have reported either negligible or increasing trends for the OMC with respect to increasing the TDA content [42][43][44]. These unexpected trends may be attributed to TDA segregation (and hence TDA clustering) effects caused by inadequate soil-TDA mixing during sample preparation for the compaction test [19,39].…”
Section: Governing Mechanisms Controlling the Compactability Of Soil-tda Blendsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The reductions reported for the OMC have been mainly ascribed to the TDA material's hydrophobic character and hence its lower water adsorption-retention capacity (being mainly less than 4%) compared with that of the fine soil particles, particularly clays [16]. It should be mentioned that, while the reported results for the MDUW are fairly consistent, a limited number of studies have reported either negligible or increasing trends for the OMC with respect to increasing the TDA content [42][43][44]. These unexpected trends may be attributed to TDA segregation (and hence TDA clustering) effects caused by inadequate soil-TDA mixing during sample preparation for the compaction test [19,39].…”
Section: Governing Mechanisms Controlling the Compactability Of Soil-tda Blendsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Akbarimehr et al [ 41 ] measured the damping ratio of rubber-modified clay and proposed that the optimal rubber content is 10%. When the rubber content exceeds 30%, it is challenging to prepare uniform test specimens because of the influence of rubber.…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have mainly discussed clay-TDA interactions in a way similar to that of clay-sand mixtures, attempting to link the variations of the UCS to changes in cohesion and friction. However, the terminologies employed in this context, such as "interparticle cohesion" and "interparticle friction", are often vague, as they do not explicitly clarify which components of the TDA-blended composite are actually involved in the development of cohesion and friction [2,23,28,29,35]. Conventionally, for clay-sand mixtures, the loss of cohesion at low sand contents is often small, while the increase in friction can be high; consequently, the UCS can increase.…”
Section: Soil-tda Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%