Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils 2006
DOI: 10.1201/noe0415426916.ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geotechnical characterization and behaviour of Argentinean collapsible loess

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SASW technique applied in the adjacent area of the test field [28] gave values of V S ¼ 1602180 m=s near the surface, while for depths larger than 3 m values of V S ¼ 1902225 m=s were reported. Down-hole tests performed by Rinaldi et al [35] are in the range of V S ¼ 2002320 m=s for depths up to 5 m. These results show that the values obtained using different experimental techniques may exhibit marked differences among them. The differences among these techniques are attributed to the extension of the soil profile covered during the tests, considering possible heterogeneousness inside each stratum, to the capacity of each technique of mitigating the experimental noises, and to the consistency between the analytical and experimental versions of the target function, among other factors.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The SASW technique applied in the adjacent area of the test field [28] gave values of V S ¼ 1602180 m=s near the surface, while for depths larger than 3 m values of V S ¼ 1902225 m=s were reported. Down-hole tests performed by Rinaldi et al [35] are in the range of V S ¼ 2002320 m=s for depths up to 5 m. These results show that the values obtained using different experimental techniques may exhibit marked differences among them. The differences among these techniques are attributed to the extension of the soil profile covered during the tests, considering possible heterogeneousness inside each stratum, to the capacity of each technique of mitigating the experimental noises, and to the consistency between the analytical and experimental versions of the target function, among other factors.…”
Section: Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Oedometric modulus was measured in 134 studied samples, effective shear strength parameters in 87 samples, and total shear strength parameters in 35 samples. They are important parameters to determine the geotechnical behaviour [ 29 ] of the geological environment interacting with engineering-geological structures or in connection with anthropogenic changes. Considering the fact that mechanical properties are influenced by consistency, it is advisable to classify the studied samples according to consistency and later evaluate their parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This produces significant settlements that affect civil infrastructure and structures that suffer significant distortions (Rocca et al, 2006). Loessial soils cover approximately 10% of the continents, including North America, Europe, Asia and South America (Rinaldi et al, 2007). The most significant loess formations are found in Argentina (Iriondo, 1997;Zárate, 2003), the Czech Republic (Marschalko et al, 2013), China (Kukla and An, 1989), Russia (Little et al, 2002), Spain (Günster et al, 2001) and the USA (Leighton and Willman, 1950).…”
Section: Main Characteristics Of Loessmentioning
confidence: 98%