2016
DOI: 10.1680/gfea.60876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geotechnical Finite Element Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As per [19], the horizontal boundaries to be (4:6) D, where D is tunnel diameter, and vertical boundaries to be (3:4) D. The full model has dimensions of 100 m×100 m×54.5 m, length, width, and depth accordingly. The distances around the tunnel-shaft connection were chosen to reduce boundary effects on results as per [19].…”
Section: Loads and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per [19], the horizontal boundaries to be (4:6) D, where D is tunnel diameter, and vertical boundaries to be (3:4) D. The full model has dimensions of 100 m×100 m×54.5 m, length, width, and depth accordingly. The distances around the tunnel-shaft connection were chosen to reduce boundary effects on results as per [19].…”
Section: Loads and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model dimensions were selected such that the boundary conditions don't affect the calculation results. This was initially performed based on the rules of thumb given by [20]. For the current case, the vertical boundaries were set to the largest distance of 3B or 2L after the loading area of interest (where B is the raft width and L is the column length).…”
Section: Model Geometry and Meshingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the recommendation of Lees [28], the minimum horizontal distance between the vertical edges of the trench should be 4 times its height so that the effects of the boundaries of the model on the results of the analysis was minimized. This recommendation is used for the distance between the vertical and lower bounds of the numerical model ( Fig.…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%