2018
DOI: 10.28927/sr.412107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geotechnical Risk, Regulation, and Public Policy (Victor de Mello Lecture)

Abstract: At this time, there is a crisis associated with concern over the safety of tailings dams and lack of trust in their design and performance. This crisis has resulted from recent high-profile failures of dams at locations with strong technical experience, conscientious operators, and established regulatory procedures. It is the primary intent of this Lecture to assess the underlying cause(s) for this crisis, review the response to it by various agencies, and to make recommendations on how to overcome it. The Lec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, acceptance and tolerance curves have been proposed, and more recently they became stricter, more severe, indicating lower risk acceptance by the society. Presently, most risk criteria limit the acceptance zone of one potential life loss (consequence) to a probability of 10 -4 to 10 -5 (FEMA, 2015;Morgenstern, 2018), as shown in Fig. 13, assuming a life loss compensation of R$ 10 million (Brazilian Real -BRL).…”
Section: Risk Management Applied To Geotechnical Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since then, acceptance and tolerance curves have been proposed, and more recently they became stricter, more severe, indicating lower risk acceptance by the society. Presently, most risk criteria limit the acceptance zone of one potential life loss (consequence) to a probability of 10 -4 to 10 -5 (FEMA, 2015;Morgenstern, 2018), as shown in Fig. 13, assuming a life loss compensation of R$ 10 million (Brazilian Real -BRL).…”
Section: Risk Management Applied To Geotechnical Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other institutions in Brazil have also contributed actively to risk management in geotechnical structures, such as the Federal University of Ouro Preto (UFOP), Pontifical University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) and University of São Paulo (USP), to cite a few. Lately, this topic has been gaining importance in the Brazilian geotechnical community and widely disseminated by the ABMS, contemplating risk aspects, analysis and management in three Milton Vargas Lectures (Coutinho, 2010;Aoki, 2011;Hachich, 2018), two Pacheco Silva Conferences (this paper; Aoki, 2016) and two Victor de Mello Lectures (Mitchell, 2014;Morgenstern, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, and more than ever, the mining industry is being increasingly challenged to improve tailings management. The recurrence of tailings storage facility (TSF) failures in recent years has created a crisis in terms of a loss of confidence and trust associated with the design, construction, operation and closure of such facilities (Morgenstern 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2019. Morgenstern (2018) stated in the written version of his Victor de Mello Lecture: "At this time, there is a crisis associated with concern over the safety of tailings dams and lack of trust in their design and performance" as well as emphasized during the lecture itself that engineers have to consider that a tailings dam will liquefy if the material deposited is in a contractive condition: "if it can it will [liquefy]". Few countries, like Brazil, took a radical step and legislated to banish upstream method tailings dams, postulating a time framework for all existing upstream dams to be decharacterized, with decharacterization having to follow stricter requirements than decommissioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%