Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation 2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139151153.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geothermal Energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a broad range of geophysical systems for which this is an excellent approximation, including the convection of saline groundwater driven by evaporation at the upper surface (Duffy & Al-Hassan 1988;Wooding, Tyler & White 1997a;Wooding et al 1997b), and the extraction of geothermal energy driven by underground heat sources (Cheng 1978;Goldstein et al 2011). We consider a fluid that initially contains a dissolved solute at some concentration C * − .…”
Section: Overview Of Physical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a broad range of geophysical systems for which this is an excellent approximation, including the convection of saline groundwater driven by evaporation at the upper surface (Duffy & Al-Hassan 1988;Wooding, Tyler & White 1997a;Wooding et al 1997b), and the extraction of geothermal energy driven by underground heat sources (Cheng 1978;Goldstein et al 2011). We consider a fluid that initially contains a dissolved solute at some concentration C * − .…”
Section: Overview Of Physical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual energy output is always lower than the maximum energy output since a power plant can be out of service or operating at a lower capacity due to equipment maintenance or failure or, in the case of solar or wind power, due to lack of resources. According to Goldstein et al (2011), the average CF of all operational geothermal power plants is 74.5 %, while new plants often reach 90 % or more. This is higher than the CF of coal-and gas-fired power plants and much higher than the CF of other renewable energy technologies that are dependent on weather, such as solar and wind power (Goldstein et al, 2011;U.S.…”
Section: Levelized Cost Of Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Goldstein et al (2011), the average CF of all operational geothermal power plants is 74.5 %, while new plants often reach 90 % or more. This is higher than the CF of coal-and gas-fired power plants and much higher than the CF of other renewable energy technologies that are dependent on weather, such as solar and wind power (Goldstein et al, 2011;U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2012;REN21, 2014).…”
Section: Levelized Cost Of Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, available major exploration methods to determine a target fracture by imaging subsurface geothermal reservoirs until the present are confined only to the resistivity and seismic surveys, where they use electromagnetic and elastic waves, respectively, both of which do not go straight on. The positioning resolutions of imaging by these methods are not so satisfactory such that the drilling of exploration wells in greenfield areas is reported to have a success rate of typically about 50 to 60 % (Goldstein et al, 2011). About half of the drilling cost is wasted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%