2021
DOI: 10.31214/ijthfa.v4i1.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geothermal Gradients in the Upper Amazon Basin derived from BHT data

Abstract: The Upper Amazon Basin (UAB), present foredeep of the sub Andean retro-foreland basin. It comprises Putumayo area (southeastern part of Colombia), Oriente area (eastern Ecuador) and Marañón area (northeastern part of Peru). Bottom Hole Temperature (BHT) from a regional well log database (1076 wells and 2957 logs) were analyzed and data discriminated according to drilling operations (i.e., log acquisition operations, cementing, formation test, tools misreading values), topography and shallow subsurface weatheri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…En algunas cuencas se estudió el gradiente geotérmico, el antearco (Manabí, Golfo de Guayaquil y la Provincia Geológica Progreso-Tumbes), que presentan un gradiente geotérmico promedio bajo (17 a 24°C/km), debido a la presencia de un basamento oceánico frío de edad Cretácico medio (Barba, 2017). En el caso de la cuenca Oriente, se reportan gradientes geotérmicos promedios de 22°C/km (Burgos et al, 2004), 21,4°C/km para un intervalo de 1,5 a 3,5 km de profundidad (Hamza et al, 2005) y 23,9°C/km (Barba et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…En algunas cuencas se estudió el gradiente geotérmico, el antearco (Manabí, Golfo de Guayaquil y la Provincia Geológica Progreso-Tumbes), que presentan un gradiente geotérmico promedio bajo (17 a 24°C/km), debido a la presencia de un basamento oceánico frío de edad Cretácico medio (Barba, 2017). En el caso de la cuenca Oriente, se reportan gradientes geotérmicos promedios de 22°C/km (Burgos et al, 2004), 21,4°C/km para un intervalo de 1,5 a 3,5 km de profundidad (Hamza et al, 2005) y 23,9°C/km (Barba et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…However, conventional methods are still widely used, e.g., [31], because they are easier to apply and require less information about the geophysical properties of the drilling fluid and the formation, as well as less computational effort than the more complex methods. Thus, they are often applied at wells with poor documentation where the accuracy of the information may be doubted or where the necessary parameters for the correction methods are often not known at all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%