“…Different methods have been used by researchers to evaluate fluid flow pathways and their effective parameters in various geothermal reservoirs around the world. Numerical modeling (Gunnarsson & Aradóttir, 2015; Strehlow et al., 2015), structural and laboratory experiments (Eggertsson et al., 2020; J. Farquharson et al., 2015; Kendrick et al., 2013; Liotta et al., 2020), geochemical studies (Ásmundsson et al., 2014; Darling & Armannsson, 1989; Libbey & Williams‐Jones, 2016), and geophysical methods (Aizawa et al., 2009; Bertrand et al., 2013, 2022; Cordell et al., 2019; Hacıoğlu et al., 2021; Heise et al., 2016; Marwan et al., 2021; Miller et al., 2022; Pavez et al., 2020; Tang et al., 2008) have been performed to estimate the potential flow routes in volcanic zones, with different depths of investigation. Most studies on porosity estimation have considered either laboratory measurements or numerical models; however, utilizing geophysical imaging together with laboratory data provides detailed and reservoir‐scale estimation of physical properties with depths of investigation down to hundreds of kilometers when utilizing a broad range of frequencies.…”