The large-scale collection of seawater samples and analysis of trace elements and isotopes by the GEOTRACES program call for careful comparison and examination of different methods for sample collection, treatment, and processing. Here we report results for different filter types, sampling bottles, and preconcentration methods for Nd from seawater. Neodymium isotope ratios and concentrations of unfiltered and filtered seawater using five different filter types agree within 43-56 ppm (2s standard deviation, SD) and 10% (relative 2s standard deviation), respectively. The filter choice therefore has no effect on the measured parameters at the studied locations in the western North Atlantic. This could well be different, however, in areas of high particle concentrations. We therefore strongly recommend filtration of seawater for Nd isotope and rare earth element concentration measurements. Dissolved Nd ratios and Nd concentrations are reported for the North Atlantic (BATS) and North Pacific (SAFe), and profiles of all rare earth elements are reported for BATS. These baseline profiles are recommended for continued quality control and intercalibration by future GEOTRACES cruises.
AcknowledgmentsWe thank Bob Anderson, Marty Fleisher, and Tim Kenna (LDEO) for the excellent team work before, during, and after the cruises. Special thanks to Greg Cutter, Ken Bruland, and Rob Sherrell for leading the intercalibration effort. We thank the science party of both intercalibration cruises and captain and crew of the R/V Knorr. E. Sholkovitz, G. Bayon, associate Editor P. Croot, and one anonymous reviewer are greatly acknowledged for their constructive reviews. Most previously published seawater Nd isotopic compositions and Nd concentrations are reported for unfiltered seawater (e.g., Piepgras et al. 1979;Piepgras and Wasserburg 1980, 1987;Jeandel 1993; Jeandel et al. 1998;Amakawa et al. 2004;Lacan and Jeandel 2004a, 2004b, 2005Rickli et al. 2009). Alibo and Nozaki (1999) Nd ratios and Nd concentrations at SAFe. The results obtained on filtered seawater are compared with previously published results, hydrography at the stations, and particle compositions. We recommend the use of these profiles as 'baseline profiles' for reoccupation and continuous intercalibration in the future, in particular of the deeper samples for which a stronger temporal stability can be expected.
Materials and procedures
Sample locationsSamples for this study were collected during two GEOT-RACES intercalibration cruises on R/V Knorr. During cruise KN193-6 (Bermuda-Norfolk, June-July 2008), we collected seawater samples at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-Series Study station (BATS, 31°40¢ N, 64°10¢ W) from 20 m and 2000 m water depth and a full water column profile, as well as seawater from a station on the Virginia continental slope (Virginia slope station, 37°2¢ N, 74°24¢ W) from 36 m water depth (Fig. 1a). During cruise KN195-8 (Honolulu-San Diego, May 2009), we collected a seawater profile at the North Pacific Sampling and Analysis of Iron station ...