2012
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2012.10.234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GEOTRACES intercalibration of neodymium isotopes and rare earth element concentrations in seawater and suspended particles. Part 1: reproducibility of results for the international intercomparison

Abstract: ISI Document Delivery No.: 956AU Times Cited: 14 Cited Reference Count: 45 Cited References: Alibo DS, 1999, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V63, P363, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00279-8 Bishop J., METHODS IN PRESS Bishop JKB, 2008, DEEP-SEA RES PT I, V55, P1684, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr.2008.07.012 Chu ZY, 2009, J ANAL ATOM SPECTROM, V24, P1534, DOI 10.1039/b904047a COLLIER R, 1984, PROG OCEANOGR, V13, P113, DOI 10.1016/0079-6611(84)90008-9 Cullen JT, 1999, MAR CHEM, V67, P233, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00060-2 DEPAOLO DJ, 197… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
83
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

8
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
11
83
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the individual e Nd results from the different stations reveals no systematic offsets among the different filter types and pore sizes. Furthermore, the obtained average Nd isotopic compositions at BATS (20m: e Nd = -9.8 ± 0.56, 2000 m: e Nd = -13.3 ± 0.43) agree well with the average values and precision achieved by the international intercalibration at BATS 15 m (e Nd = -9.2 ± 0.60, 13 labs) and BATS 2000 m (e Nd = -13.1 ± 0.59, 13 labs) (van de Flierdt et al 2012). The additional analysis of an 'unknown' Nd standard by participating labs also resulted in a similar 2s standard deviation of 56 ppm (13 labs, van de Flierdt et al 2012).…”
Section: Filter Testssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of the individual e Nd results from the different stations reveals no systematic offsets among the different filter types and pore sizes. Furthermore, the obtained average Nd isotopic compositions at BATS (20m: e Nd = -9.8 ± 0.56, 2000 m: e Nd = -13.3 ± 0.43) agree well with the average values and precision achieved by the international intercalibration at BATS 15 m (e Nd = -9.2 ± 0.60, 13 labs) and BATS 2000 m (e Nd = -13.1 ± 0.59, 13 labs) (van de Flierdt et al 2012). The additional analysis of an 'unknown' Nd standard by participating labs also resulted in a similar 2s standard deviation of 56 ppm (13 labs, van de Flierdt et al 2012).…”
Section: Filter Testssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The additional analysis of an 'unknown' Nd standard by participating labs also resulted in a similar 2s standard deviation of 56 ppm (13 labs, van de Flierdt et al 2012). The close similarity between the precision of seawater samples that included extensive sample processing by the individual labs, using different preconcentration and ion chromatography methods, and the 'unknown' Nd standard that did not require any processing, led us to conclude that an inter-laboratory precision of around ± 0.6 e Nd units is the best that can be achieved on samples of 5-15 ng Nd, and that the observed differences are due to analytical uncertainty rather than sample processing or matrix effects (van de Flierdt et al 2012). The precision of our filter tests of ± 0.43-0.56 e Nd units is therefore within the expected analytical uncertainty.…”
Section: Filter Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The external reproducibility (2σ), determined by repeated processing and analysis of seawater samples from BATS (Bermuda Atlantic Times Series station) from 20 m and 2000 m water depth, was b10% for all REEs except for Ce (b 18%; n = 5). Our analyses were within the 8% range of the consensus values of the BATS samples Van de Flierdt et al, 2012). Procedural blanks were b 4% for all REEs except for the lowest measured Ce concentration (b10%).…”
Section: 44mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…that mixes into LCDW, it is plausible that the western basin receives AABW with a less radiogenic ε Nd signature mixed into LCDW from the Weddell Sea and Adélie Coast van de Flierdt et al, 2006). A slight negative shift towards ε Nd = −9 is also observed at the depth of the salinity maximum of LCDW at all western transect stations south of the SAF (PS75/095, PS75/089, PS75/088) and also at the eastern transect stations south of the SAF (Fig.…”
Section: Western Transectmentioning
confidence: 99%