2009
DOI: 10.5771/9783845214931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gerechtigkeit und Wahlverhalten

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this argument may apply more strongly to high-SES students than to low-SES students given their higher degree of political mobilisation (Hadjar and Schlapbach, 2009). Other empirical findings suggest that perceptions of social injustice or of being treated unjustly lead to less political efficacy and less political participation rather than encouraging political participation to achieve political change (Mühleck 2009).…”
Section: General Approaches: Education and Political Participationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, this argument may apply more strongly to high-SES students than to low-SES students given their higher degree of political mobilisation (Hadjar and Schlapbach, 2009). Other empirical findings suggest that perceptions of social injustice or of being treated unjustly lead to less political efficacy and less political participation rather than encouraging political participation to achieve political change (Mühleck 2009).…”
Section: General Approaches: Education and Political Participationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The study of consequences of justice is based on the same logic. In this case, q is some social phenomenon (explanandum) which is affected by notions of justice-e.g., the level of trust in a society (Tyler, 2001), political participation (Mühleck, 2009) or employee theft rate in firms (Greenberg, 1990)-p are the determinants (explanans). Justice (j) is then one of these factors affecting a certain outcome: q=f (p,j).…”
Section: Justice As a Multi-level Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%