2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00188-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Germ line polymorphisms of the tumor suppressor gene p53 and lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not well understood how the common, low-penetrance genes involving cell cycle checkpoints contribute to the lung cancer susceptibility, partly because data on genetic polymorphisms involving cell cycle control genes are sparse. Reports on the association of p53 and Chk2 gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk are inconsistent (50)(51)(52)(53). SNPs are often considered indicators of genetic risks across individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not well understood how the common, low-penetrance genes involving cell cycle checkpoints contribute to the lung cancer susceptibility, partly because data on genetic polymorphisms involving cell cycle control genes are sparse. Reports on the association of p53 and Chk2 gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk are inconsistent (50)(51)(52)(53). SNPs are often considered indicators of genetic risks across individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other intron 6 base substitutions have been reported, suggesting that this locus represents a potential hot spot region for mutation. Several epidemiological studies have confirmed the correlation between the intron 6 polymorphism and increased risk for the development of various cancer types (Hillebrandt et al, 1997;Biro et al, 2000;Biros et al, 2001;Fiszer-Maliszewska et al, 2003;Buyru et al, 2005).…”
Section: Polymorphism Of Intron 6 (G-c)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Of these publications, three (Biros et al 2001a;Fan et al 2000;Murata et al 1996) were excluded because the same data were available in other studies (Biros et al 2001b;Miller et al 2002;Murata et al 1998). In three of the remaining 28 publications (Birgander et al 1995;Biros et al 2001a;Fernandez-Rubio et al 2008;Giuliani et al 2007;Hiraki et al 2003;Honma et al 2008;Irarrazabal et al 2003;Jain et al 2005;Jin et al 1995;Jung et al 2008;Liu et al 2001;Mechanic et al 2007;Miller et al 2002;Murata et al 1998;Nadji et al 2007;Papadakis et al 2002;Pierce et al 2000;Popanda et al 2007;Sakiyama et al 2005;Sreeja et al 2008;Szymanowska et al 2006;To-Figueras et al 1996;Wang et al 1999;Weston et al 1992;Weston et al 1994;Wu et al 2002;Zhang et al 2003;Zhang et al 2006), the ORs were presented separately according to the diVerent ethnicities: Mechanic et al (2007) sorted the data in African and Caucasian, respectively; Pierce et al (2000) presented the data according to Caucasian, Asian, and Mixed descent, respectively; and Jin et al (1995) presented the data according to African-American and Mexican-American, respectively.…”
Section: Main Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%