2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23005-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

German Corporate Governance in International and European Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The German corporate governance system prescribes a two-tier board structure for stock-listed corporations ("Aktiengesellschaften"), distinguishing between the management board ("Vorstand") and the supervisory board ("Aufsichtsrat";Du Plessis et al, 2012). Due to its responsibility for the firm's strategic and operational decision-making (Du Plessis et al, 2012), we base our analysis on the former.…”
Section: Sample and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The German corporate governance system prescribes a two-tier board structure for stock-listed corporations ("Aktiengesellschaften"), distinguishing between the management board ("Vorstand") and the supervisory board ("Aufsichtsrat";Du Plessis et al, 2012). Due to its responsibility for the firm's strategic and operational decision-making (Du Plessis et al, 2012), we base our analysis on the former.…”
Section: Sample and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The German corporate governance system prescribes a two-tier board structure for stock-listed corporations ("Aktiengesellschaften"), distinguishing between the management board ("Vorstand") and the supervisory board ("Aufsichtsrat";Du Plessis et al, 2012). Due to its responsibility for the firm's strategic and operational decision-making (Du Plessis et al, 2012), we base our analysis on the former. Specifically, the management board influences firm innovativeness directly by setting the firm's strategic direction toward innovation (Talke et al, 2010), determining the resources allocated toward innovation actions (Talke et al, 2011) and instilling a culture of innovativeness in the firm (Sperber, 2016).…”
Section: Sample and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they are not independent in such a manner and, in this way, may think that it's hard to adapt to the CEOs when offering counsel on CEO's remuneration and different issues. When they have been designated, these independent directors have a solid motivating force to keep up a decent association with the senior management (Du Plessis et al, 2012). Ghaffar (2014) led a review to see the effect of corporate governance practices on the profitability of Islamic banks in Pakistan.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%