2012
DOI: 10.1108/14635781211206896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

German valuation: review of methods and legal framework

Abstract: PurposeThere is a continuing discussion about whether German valuation methods are inaccurate and inferior to the British standard, and the enduring efforts for a European and internationally standardised valuation method and value definitions intensify this discussion. The German valuation system is said to lead to valuations which do not reflect actual market conditions and excessive smoothing. Not surprisingly, German surveyors usually disagree and claim that the German valuation approach, with its sustaina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A valuer is usually required to develop his appraisal reports subject to the principles, guiding norms of good practice and appraisal methods codified in international and regional standards and under professional, statutory, international, national or local laws or regulations (see for example [21][22][23][24]). Despite ongoing debates over the differences between nationally recommended methods, they can be expected to lead to comparable results [25]. Hence, a valuer is not to be seen merely as an individual professional expert but rather as an actor operating in a regulated environment [6].…”
Section: The Valuation Professionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A valuer is usually required to develop his appraisal reports subject to the principles, guiding norms of good practice and appraisal methods codified in international and regional standards and under professional, statutory, international, national or local laws or regulations (see for example [21][22][23][24]). Despite ongoing debates over the differences between nationally recommended methods, they can be expected to lead to comparable results [25]. Hence, a valuer is not to be seen merely as an individual professional expert but rather as an actor operating in a regulated environment [6].…”
Section: The Valuation Professionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using verified historical market information, the German valuation methodology tries to limit subjectivity of valuations to a minimum (Schnaidt and Sebastian, 2012). The standardization process and incorporation of real live (and, hence, historical) data are seen as a big advantage by many German valuers who dismiss the DCF due to a lack of transparency, claiming that predicting future rents would require a “prophetic gift” (Kleiber, 2007).…”
Section: Income-based Valuation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GIA differs significantly from internationally applied Anglo-Saxon valuation methods and there is an ongoing discussion about its comparative suitability. Unsurprising many German researchers and professionals are in favor of the GIA while international sources express a preference for Anglo-Saxon methods such as the DCF (see Schnaidt and Sebastian, 2012 for a summary of the debate).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, all approaches should lead to same result (market value). However, German methods have been shown to be mathematically prone to smoothing biases (Schnaidt and Sebastian, 2012). While changes in value in international methods are typically significantly driven by actual market rents and investment yields, the regulated German valuation system has four key value drivers: rents, yields (Liegenschaftszins), remaining useful lifetime of the building and finally the value of the land.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%