2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4772062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Germano identity-based subgrid-scale modeling: A brief survey of variations on a fertile theme

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inResponse to "Comment on 'A dynamic nonlinear subgrid-scale stress model'" [Phys. Fluids17, 099101 (2005)] Phys. Fluids 17, 099102 (2005); 10.1063/1.2046711 Comment on "A dynamic nonlinear subgrid-scale stress model" [Phys. Fluids17, 035109 (2005)] Phys. Fluids 17, 099101 (2005); 10.1063/1.2033107The subgrid-scale estimation model applied to large eddy simulations of compressible turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such couplings across scales are clearer in shear flows than they are in homogeneous isotropic turbulence [75], and suggest corrections to standard modelling methods for such flows. For example, while classical test filtering in the sense of Germano [35] (see Meneveau [76] for a recent review) permits the Smagorinsky coefficient in the subfilter-scales of a LES to vary dynamically, velocity-intermittency coupling implies refined perspectives on the relation between production and dissipation [77,78], and an alternative approach to closure development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such couplings across scales are clearer in shear flows than they are in homogeneous isotropic turbulence [75], and suggest corrections to standard modelling methods for such flows. For example, while classical test filtering in the sense of Germano [35] (see Meneveau [76] for a recent review) permits the Smagorinsky coefficient in the subfilter-scales of a LES to vary dynamically, velocity-intermittency coupling implies refined perspectives on the relation between production and dissipation [77,78], and an alternative approach to closure development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between these two is the contribution of the sub-grid scales [38]. One may try to write the difference in additive form i.e., N (ϕ) = N (ϕ) + M F , where the "model" M F can be of any type and the subscript F is used to remark that the model is defined at the F filter level, (.…”
Section: Dynamic Finite-rate Scale Similarity Sgs Combustion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If one filters the nonlinear operator using the test filter, the operator at the F G level is derived, i. [38]. The identity can be used to evaluate the coefficients in the "model" part of the filtered operator.…”
Section: Dynamic Finite-rate Scale Similarity Sgs Combustion Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As recalled in the abstract, the first application of the dynamic modelling approach was presented thirty years ago at the Summer Meeting of the CTR [11], and since then a lot of different applications flourished thanks to the interest of many researchers around the world. We refer both to the cited Reference [12] and to Reference [13] for more details on that.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%