1984
DOI: 10.2307/3898846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Germination Profiles of Introduced Lovegrasses at Six Constant Temperatures

Abstract: Seeds of A-68 Lehmann lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana Nees), cochise lovegrass (Eragrostis Iehmanniana Nees X Eragrostis trichophora Coss & Dur.) and A-84 and Catalina boer lovegrasses (Eragrostis curvula var. conferta Nees) accessions were germinated for 14 days at constant temperatures of 15,18,21,24, 27, and 30" C. Light intensity was 216 p mol m-k-' and photoperiod was 15 h. Germination of Catalina seeds varied from 87 to 96% between 18 and 300 C after 12 days. Germination of cochise seeds was optimum be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Las plántulas de D. californica produjeron más biomasa por planta (1.09 vs. 0.31g), exhibieron mayor eficiencia en el uso del nitrógeno (63 vs. 39 %), y toleraron mejor condiciones de alto nivel de N. D. californica podría ser un competidor superior por N tanto en condiciones de N limitante como en aquellas de alto nivel de N, mientras que E. lehmanniana podría superar a D. californica en la competencia por N bajo niveles moderados de este nutriente. and Cox 1984); and relative unpalatability compared to natives (Cox et al 1990). Lehmann lovegrass also can use soil water during the winter and early spring, when other warm-season plants are generally considered to be dormant, and is able to extract soil water at very low soil water potential (Frasier and Cox 1994).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Las plántulas de D. californica produjeron más biomasa por planta (1.09 vs. 0.31g), exhibieron mayor eficiencia en el uso del nitrógeno (63 vs. 39 %), y toleraron mejor condiciones de alto nivel de N. D. californica podría ser un competidor superior por N tanto en condiciones de N limitante como en aquellas de alto nivel de N, mientras que E. lehmanniana podría superar a D. californica en la competencia por N bajo niveles moderados de este nutriente. and Cox 1984); and relative unpalatability compared to natives (Cox et al 1990). Lehmann lovegrass also can use soil water during the winter and early spring, when other warm-season plants are generally considered to be dormant, and is able to extract soil water at very low soil water potential (Frasier and Cox 1994).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…and Cox 1984); and relative unpalatability compared to natives (Cox et al 1990). Lehmann lovegrass also can use soil water during the winter and early spring, when other warm-season plants are generally considered to be dormant, and is able to extract soil water at very low soil water potential (Frasier and Cox 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is a native perennial lovegrass that is adapted to higher Although Jordan and Haferkamp (1989) presented germination rate data for Cochise and plains lovegrass, little other germination data have been reported for these 2 species. Germination of Cochise lovegrass was much higher than that of Lehmann lovegrass at constant temperatures of 15, 18, and 21" C (Martin and Cox 1984). Germination responses of Cochise and plains lovegrass to alternating temperatures have not been reported but Chirco and Turner (1986) recommended alternating temperatures of 20/ 30° C and 20/ 35" C for testing of Lehmann and plains lovegrass germination, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lehmann lovegrass germination responses to different temperature and other treatments vary greatly depending on collection and seed age. Certain collections of Lehmann lovegrass have exhibited high germination under constant temperatures (Toole 1938;Knipe 1967;Ryan et al 1975a,b;Martin and Cox 1984). Some collections have a strong post-harvest or extended dormancy that may decrease with time, mechanical scarification, exposure to light, prechilling, and various moisture and temperature pretreatments (Knipe and Herbel 1960, Brauen 1967, Wright 1973, Hardegree and Emmerch 1991.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%