2011
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.127480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Germline Fitness-Based Scoring of Cancer Mutations

Abstract: A key goal in cancer research is to find the genomic alterations that underlie malignant cells. Genomics has proved successful in identifying somatic variants at a large scale. However, it has become evident that a typical cancer exhibits a heterogenous mutation pattern across samples. Cases where the same alteration is observed repeatedly seem to be the exception rather than the norm. Thus, pinpointing the key alterations (driver mutations) from a background of variations with no direct causal link to cancer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4D; Kaminker et al 2007;Forbes et al 2008). This corresponds with the observation that driver mutations are preponderant at protein functional sites (Dixit et al 2009;Izarzugaza et al 2009;Talavera et al 2010), and that they occur in regions that have significant consequences for germline fitness in addition to the somatic fitness of clonally expanding neoplastic cell populations (Fischer et al 2011). This is different from noncancerous complex diseases, where the genetic basis of each disease is attributable to many causal variants with very small fitness effects.…”
Section: Evolutionary Distributions Of Disease-associated Variantssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…4D; Kaminker et al 2007;Forbes et al 2008). This corresponds with the observation that driver mutations are preponderant at protein functional sites (Dixit et al 2009;Izarzugaza et al 2009;Talavera et al 2010), and that they occur in regions that have significant consequences for germline fitness in addition to the somatic fitness of clonally expanding neoplastic cell populations (Fischer et al 2011). This is different from noncancerous complex diseases, where the genetic basis of each disease is attributable to many causal variants with very small fitness effects.…”
Section: Evolutionary Distributions Of Disease-associated Variantssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The chosen driver strength [s d ∌0.1 (i.e., 10% growth increase per driver); range 0.01-1] was shown to be congruent with cancer onset (19). Passenger deleteriousness (s p ∌10 −3 ; range 10 −1 -10 −4 ) was estimated from to the effects of near-neutral germ-line mutations in humans (33) and randomly introduced mutations in yeast (14). Simulations where drivers or passengers conferred a distribution of s p and s d did not significantly differ from our fixed-effect model (SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…deleterious mutations (14,33). Such small selection coefficients for individual passengers are typically undetectable in cell cultures, yet critical for long-term cancer dynamics.…”
Section: Moderately Deleterious Passengers Fixate and Alter Cancer Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 The scoring reveals that, as a set, the mutations are significantly less deleterious than random in silico–generated missense mutations (P<0.001) (Fig. 3A).…”
Section: Resutsmentioning
confidence: 96%