2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12651-009-0009-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geschlechterunterschiede in den Arbeitswerten: eine Analyse für die alten Bundesländer 1980–2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statements made by the interviewees that women also 'care more' supports this. Studies support this assumption, as women tend to prefer professions and fields of work with an altruistic orientation, but men's and women's values converge over time (Pollmann-Schult 2009), which is on the one hand supported by our empirical findings of men in the more caring professions SM and FGM, but on the other hand, the low proportion of men found in these professions, especially in the field of FGM, speaks against this assumption. Since the focus of the examined professions is thus very much on the-controversially-caring function of this activity, the link to the reproduction of gender stereotypes seems rather obvious.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The statements made by the interviewees that women also 'care more' supports this. Studies support this assumption, as women tend to prefer professions and fields of work with an altruistic orientation, but men's and women's values converge over time (Pollmann-Schult 2009), which is on the one hand supported by our empirical findings of men in the more caring professions SM and FGM, but on the other hand, the low proportion of men found in these professions, especially in the field of FGM, speaks against this assumption. Since the focus of the examined professions is thus very much on the-controversially-caring function of this activity, the link to the reproduction of gender stereotypes seems rather obvious.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…According to Busch-Heizmann [4], one of the useful methods of empirically examining the preferences of job attributes is to look at job values or attributes that individuals rate as important or satisfactory for their work. However, the findings of some national and international studies on gender differences in job attributes are mixed: some confirm a higher value of external job attributes in men (high income) in line with supply side theory [5,6], others do not suggest any gender differences [7,8]. A research article from Spain concludes that women are more job-satisfied than men [9].…”
Section: Measurement and Classification Of Job Attributes: A Literatu...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Zafar (2013: 571) finds that pecuniary aspects of the workplace explain as much as four times of the choice for males than do non-pecuniary aspects whereas for women's choices both aspects are equally important. A number of empirical studies have, however, disappointed high flying hopes for the explanatory power of job values and life goals for occupational sex segregation (Pollmann-Schult, 2009;Ma, 2011;Busch, 2013;Mann and DiPrete, 2013;Morgan et al, 2013). Cech's study (2014) is specifically designed to separate the effects of traditional gender role beliefs from essentialist self-conceptions and demonstrates that the latter predict where men and women are placed in the spectrum of sex-segregated occupations whereas the former have little effect.…”
Section: Separate Spheres: Gendered Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%