2023
DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20210049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gestational Weight Gain Growth Charts Adapted to Japanese Pregnancies Using a Bayesian Approach in a Longitudinal Study: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study

Abstract: Background Tracking gestational weight gain (GWG) during pregnancy makes it possible to optimize pregnancy outcomes and GWG growth curves are well suitable for this purpose.The GWG guidelines for Japanese were revised in 2021. However, currently, there are no GWG growth curves to guide women on how to gain weight to meet these guidelines.Methods Using data on 96,631 live births from the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS), we created descriptive GWG percentile curves estimated the trajectory of GWG r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Age (<25 years, 25–29 years, 30–34 years, 35–39 years, or ≥40 years), pre-pregnancy BMI (underweight < 18.5 kg/m 2 , normal 18.5–24.9 kg/m 2 , overweight 25.0–29.9 kg/m 2 , or obese ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ), and maternal gestational weight gain (insufficient, appropriate, or excessive) were included as basic confounding variables. As the appropriate value for gestational weight gain depends on the pre-pregnancy BMI, we considered both pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain during pregnancy [ 16 , 17 ]. Thus, we classified the participants into 11 categories as an anthropometric parameter of mothers to predict SGA ( Figure S1 ) [ 17 , 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Age (<25 years, 25–29 years, 30–34 years, 35–39 years, or ≥40 years), pre-pregnancy BMI (underweight < 18.5 kg/m 2 , normal 18.5–24.9 kg/m 2 , overweight 25.0–29.9 kg/m 2 , or obese ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ), and maternal gestational weight gain (insufficient, appropriate, or excessive) were included as basic confounding variables. As the appropriate value for gestational weight gain depends on the pre-pregnancy BMI, we considered both pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain during pregnancy [ 16 , 17 ]. Thus, we classified the participants into 11 categories as an anthropometric parameter of mothers to predict SGA ( Figure S1 ) [ 17 , 26 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the appropriate value for gestational weight gain depends on the pre-pregnancy BMI, we considered both pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain during pregnancy [ 16 , 17 ]. Thus, we classified the participants into 11 categories as an anthropometric parameter of mothers to predict SGA ( Figure S1 ) [ 17 , 26 ]. As socioeconomic and environmental variables [ 14 ], we included household income (<5 million JPY [approximately 50,000 USD], 5 to <8 million JPY, ≥8 million JPY, or unknown), occupation (manager or others), educational attainment (≤12 years [high school] or ≥13 years [college or university]), prefectures where the women resided (prefectures with >5 million population and those with <5 million population), and date of delivery (July 2019–February 2020, March 2020–August 2020, September 2020–February 2021, or March 2021–August 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The covariates in our models were selected a priori based on previously published literature [6][7][8][29][30][31][32] and biologic plausibility. Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI was calculated using the mothers' height and pre-pregnancy weight as listed in medical records and classified as underweight (<18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), or obese (!30.0) [33]. Gestational weight gain (GWG) was categorized as below, within, or above reference values based on the guidelines of the Institute of Medicine (now known as the National Academy of Medicine) of 2009 [34].…”
Section: Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%