2017
DOI: 10.1109/thms.2017.2720667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GESTO: A Glove for Enhanced Sensing and Touching Based on Inertial and Magnetic Sensors for Hand Tracking and Cutaneous Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as it concerns the technological aspect, the use of thimble-factor devices guarantees high portability and wearability of the system, it reduces power consumption increasing the battery lifetime. The main novelties that our approach introduces with respect to the currently available solutions can be summarized as follows: i) the hand is directly controlled displaying cues in the most sensitive location [26]; ii) no encumbering devices prevent the user's hand to be free; iii) the hand orientation is suggested independently from other body parts, increasing the haptic guidance capability; iv) human arm singolarities are avoided by charging the inverse kinematics computation to the brain instead of to an algorithm; v) the approach can be combined with any hand tracking system, like camerabased (Vicon, Optitrack, LeapMotion), inertial-based ( [27], [28]) and fabric-based (Cyberglove) devices. In conclusion, we believe that the proposed system paved the way for the development of more complex systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as it concerns the technological aspect, the use of thimble-factor devices guarantees high portability and wearability of the system, it reduces power consumption increasing the battery lifetime. The main novelties that our approach introduces with respect to the currently available solutions can be summarized as follows: i) the hand is directly controlled displaying cues in the most sensitive location [26]; ii) no encumbering devices prevent the user's hand to be free; iii) the hand orientation is suggested independently from other body parts, increasing the haptic guidance capability; iv) human arm singolarities are avoided by charging the inverse kinematics computation to the brain instead of to an algorithm; v) the approach can be combined with any hand tracking system, like camerabased (Vicon, Optitrack, LeapMotion), inertial-based ( [27], [28]) and fabric-based (Cyberglove) devices. In conclusion, we believe that the proposed system paved the way for the development of more complex systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum exploitable displacement range for force generation is 6 mm, so that the device can apply a maximum force of 3 N considering a stiffness of 0.5 N/m as elastic behavior of the finger pulp. Interested readers are referred to [6] and [4] for further details on the force feedback generation. A manual calibration is performed for each participant to adjust the initial position of the belt.…”
Section: Force Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the gimbal mechanisms inevitably increase the volume of the haptic device. Optical measurement systems require a structured environment and are susceptible to noise and shadowing [30].…”
Section: Position and Attitude Tracking Of The Joystickmentioning
confidence: 99%