Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages 2002
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511486777.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It's certainly possible that either may have originated from non-linguistic gestures of listing items in the space in front of the body (for coord-shift) or on the fingers of the hand (for coord-l), as the grammaticalization of gestures in sign languages is well documented (Janzen 1999, Janzen & B Shaffer 2002Wilcox & Barb Shaffer 2006;Wilcox 2007, Pfau & Steinbach 2011. In spoken language, these gestures seem to be able to be used with both conjunction and disjunction, and therefore it's perhaps not surprising that they may have evolved into general use coordinators in ASL, as opposed to strictly conjunction or disjunction.…”
Section: :11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's certainly possible that either may have originated from non-linguistic gestures of listing items in the space in front of the body (for coord-shift) or on the fingers of the hand (for coord-l), as the grammaticalization of gestures in sign languages is well documented (Janzen 1999, Janzen & B Shaffer 2002Wilcox & Barb Shaffer 2006;Wilcox 2007, Pfau & Steinbach 2011. In spoken language, these gestures seem to be able to be used with both conjunction and disjunction, and therefore it's perhaps not surprising that they may have evolved into general use coordinators in ASL, as opposed to strictly conjunction or disjunction.…”
Section: :11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it undergoes lexicalization prior to grammaticalization) or is turned directly into a grammatical marker. As pointed out in Section 2.3, the former sequence of changes has been claimed to be responsible for the emergence of the ASL tense marker FUTURE (26a) (Janzen & Shaffer 2002). The latter path may take manual and nonmanual gestures as input.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, while the noun involves repetition, this repetition is usually lost in the grammaticalized form. Numerous other modality-independent pathways have been identified in previous studies; these include developments (i) from verb/noun/adjective to modal verb (Wilcox & Wilcox 1995;Janzen & Shaffer 2002), (ii) from verb/adverbial to completive/perfective aspect marker (Fischer & Gough 1972Meir 1999), and (iii) from adjective to intensifier (Sexton 1999). For discussion of these and other phenomena, as well as for further references, the interested reader is referred to the overview articles by Pfau & Steinbach (2006, Wilcox et al (2010), and Janzen (2012).…”
Section: Grammaticalization Of Lexical Elementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations