2018
DOI: 10.1007/bf03652004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gesture as transduction of characterisation in children’s literature animation adaptation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite many young people being highly adept at using digital media, they are not necessarily adept at understanding how multimedia affordances influence the interpretive possibilities of the texts they are negotiating (Jenkins, 2006;Kellner & Share, 2007;Luce-Kapler, 2007). While contemporary curricula such as the new Australian national curriculum can mandate such outcomes (through the requirement for year nine students to, for example, "examine how authors adapt and subvert text structures and language features by experimenting with spoken, written, visual and multimodal elements, and their combination" (ACARA, 2022, Section AC9E9LA03), the pedagogy needs to draw on semiotic accounts of how meaning is constructed jointly by language and images in different contexts (Martin, 2008;Moya-Guijarro, 2016;Painter et al, 2013;Unsworth, 2007) and use those accounts to address moving image re-versioning of multimodal literary texts in multiple digital formats including animation, iPad apps, and various forms of augmented and virtual reality (Mills et al, 2023;Ngo, 2018;Serafini et al, 2015;Unsworth, 2008Unsworth, , 2014aUnsworth, , 2014cZhao & Unsworth, 2017). The analyses in this study can directly inform classroom learning experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite many young people being highly adept at using digital media, they are not necessarily adept at understanding how multimedia affordances influence the interpretive possibilities of the texts they are negotiating (Jenkins, 2006;Kellner & Share, 2007;Luce-Kapler, 2007). While contemporary curricula such as the new Australian national curriculum can mandate such outcomes (through the requirement for year nine students to, for example, "examine how authors adapt and subvert text structures and language features by experimenting with spoken, written, visual and multimodal elements, and their combination" (ACARA, 2022, Section AC9E9LA03), the pedagogy needs to draw on semiotic accounts of how meaning is constructed jointly by language and images in different contexts (Martin, 2008;Moya-Guijarro, 2016;Painter et al, 2013;Unsworth, 2007) and use those accounts to address moving image re-versioning of multimodal literary texts in multiple digital formats including animation, iPad apps, and various forms of augmented and virtual reality (Mills et al, 2023;Ngo, 2018;Serafini et al, 2015;Unsworth, 2008Unsworth, , 2014aUnsworth, , 2014cZhao & Unsworth, 2017). The analyses in this study can directly inform classroom learning experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paralanguage that is semovergent potentially corresponds with Appraisal resources through hand/arm position, facial expression, muscle tension, bodily stance and motion as well as voice quality (Ngo 2018). Interpersonally, spoken language inscribes attitudes, grades qualities and positions voices other than the speaker's own.…”
Section: Paralanguage and Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%