Gesundheitsförderung systematisch planen und effektiv intervenieren

Schlicht, Wolfgang; Zinsmeister, Marcus

doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46989-7

Cited by 18 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Diese Planungsmodelle der Gesundheitsforschung helfen, den Prozess der Programmplanung, -umsetzung und -evaluation zu systematisieren. Die Planungsmodelle orientieren sich in der Regel an einem Planungszyklus [15]. Dabei beginnt der Prozess mit einer Bedarfsanalyse und endet mit einer Evaluation.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Scientific Support Active City: Eine theoriegeleitete Bedarfsanalyse zur städtischen Bewegungsförderung

Schumacher

Bischoff

Schäfer

et al. 2023

B&G Bewegungstherapie und Gesundheitssport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung Einleitung Die positive Wirkung von Bewegung für die Gesundheit ist gut belegt. Dennoch scheinen städtische Maßnahmen zur Förderung der körperlichen Aktivität bisher nicht ausreichend erfolgreich umgesetzt zu werden. Ziel des vorliegenden Artikels ist die detaillierte Darstellung einer Bedarfsanalyse zur Förderung der körperlichen Aktivität im Rahmen des Projektes „Scientific Support Active City“ in Hamburg. Methodik In Anlehnung an den Intervention Mapping (IM) Ansatz wird zunächst eine systematische Bedarfsanalyse in fünf Schritten durchgeführt. Hierzu werden (1) Verantwortlichkeiten der Akteur*innen festgelegt, (2) Zielgruppen definiert und (3) verfügbare Datenquellen gesichtet, erfasst und geprüft. Auf dieser Basis sollen (4) Prävalenzen körperlicher Aktivität für die Zielgruppen dargestellt, (5) Ziele konkretisiert und erste Handlungsempfehlungen abgeleitet werden. Ergebnisse Nach Definition eines Kernteams sowie eines erweiterten Akteursnetzwerkes wurden für die Zielgruppen Kinder und Jugendliche, Erwachsene und ältere Erwachsene verfügbare Datenquellen identifiziert, die im Sinne eines Multi-Source Ansatzes zur Analyse des Bewegungsverhaltens genutzt werden können. Die zielgruppenspezifische Analyse verdeutlicht den Bedarf an weiteren repräsentativen Daten sowie Fördermaßnahmen z. B. für Frauen mit niedriger Bildung und Kindern aus sozio-ökonomisch schlechter gestellten Regionen. Schlussfolgerung Der IM-Ansatz hat sich in der Ausgestaltung der Bedarfsanalyse des Projektes „Scientific Support Active City“ als anwendbar erwiesen. Die initiierte Zusammenarbeit des Netzwerkes sowie der Evidenz basierte Ansatz zur Ableitung erster Bedarfe scheinen einen erfolgsversprechenden Ansatz zur Förderung der körperlichen Aktivität darzustellen. Eine langfristige städtische Gesamtstrategie für die Bewegungsförderung auf der Basis kooperativer wissensbasierter Zielfindung kann damit kurzfristige Einzelprojekte ablösen.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Scientific Support Active City: Eine theoriegeleitete Bedarfsanalyse zur städtischen Bewegungsförderung

Schumacher

Bischoff

Schäfer

et al. 2023

B&G Bewegungstherapie und Gesundheitssport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The selection was guided by the intent to include individuals who shared professional and communication skills but offered a range of opinions, to encourage dynamic and critical discussions. This approach aimed to prevent the occurrence of "group think", where decisions are influenced by conformity or dominance of certain individuals within the group [45].…”

Section: Stakeholder Workhopmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The workshop utilized the Strategic Orientation Mapping (SOR) approach for the decisionmaking process proposed by Schlicht and Zinsmeister [45]. Prior to the workshop, participants completed an online survey to prioritize fields of activity at the interface.…”

Section: Stakeholder Workhopmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing evidence ecosystems in the public health service: Development of a framework for designing tailored training programs

Arnold,

Bimczok,

Clemens

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of local evidence ecosystems in which academia and practice in the Public Health Service (PHS) are interconnected. However, appropriate organizational structures and well-trained staff are lacking and evidence use in local public health decision-making has to be integrated into training programs in Germany. To address this issue, we developed a framework incorporating a toolbox to conceptualize training programs designed to qualify public health professionals for working at the interface between academia and practice. We conducted a scoping review of training programs, key-informant interviews with public health experts, and a multi-professional stakeholder workshop and triangulated their output. The resulting toolbox consists of four core elements, encompassing 15 parameters: (1) content-related aspects, (2) context-related aspects, (3) aspects relevant for determining the training format, and (4) aspects relevant for consolidation and further development. Guiding questions with examples supports the application of the toolbox. Additionally, we introduced a how-to-use guidance to streamline the creation of new training programs, fostering knowledge transfer at the academia-practice interface, equipping public health researchers and practitioners with relevant skills for needs-based PHS research. By promoting collaborative training development across institutions, our approach encourages cross-institutional cooperation, enhances evidence utilization, and enables efficient resource allocation. This collaborative effort in developing training programs within local evidence ecosystems not only strengthens the scientific and practical impact but also lays a foundation for implementing complex public health measures effectively at the local level.

show abstract

“…The in total 44 participants were purposely selected using a sampling plan similar to the interview approach, with an emphasis on including individuals who possessed similar professional and communication skills but held diverse opinions to encourage critical discussion. This approach aimed to prevent the occurrence of "group think", where decisions are influenced by conformity or dominance of certain individuals within the group (44). The recruitment phase lasted from April 01, 2022 to June 14, 2022, and the workshop itself took place from July 04-05, 2022.…”

Section: Stakeholder Workhopmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementing evidence ecosystems in the public health service: Development of a seven-step framework for designing tailored training programs

Arnold,

Bimczok,

Clemens

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of local evidence-ecosystems in which academia and practice in the Public Health Service (PHS) are interconnected. However, appropriate organizational structures and well-trained staff are lacking and evidence use in local public health decision-making has to be integrated into training programs in Germany. To address this issue, we developed a toolbox to conceptualize training programs designed to qualify public health professionals for working at the interface between academia and practice. We conducted a scoping review of training programs, key-informant interviews with public health experts, and a multi-professional stakeholder workshop and triangulated their output. The toolbox consists of four core elements, encompassing 15 parameters: (1) content-related aspects, (2) context-related aspects, (3) aspects relevant for determining the training format, and (4) aspects relevant for consolidation and further development. Guiding questions with examples supports the application of the toolbox. The developed seven-step frame-work aims to facilitate new training programs for knowledge-transfer at the academia-practice interface, equipping public health researchers and practitioners with relevant skills for needs-based PHS research. The joint development of training approaches can foster cross-institutional collaboration and enhance evidence utilization, resulting in long-term resource savings and a stronger evidence base for implementing complex public health measures on site. In this way, co-development of tailored solutions within the local evidence ecosystem has the potential to enhance both scientific and practical impact.

show abstract

Gesundheitsförderung systematisch planen und effektiv intervenieren

Cited by 18 publications

References 19 publications

Scientific Support Active City: Eine theoriegeleitete Bedarfsanalyse zur städtischen Bewegungsförderung

Scientific Support Active City: Eine theoriegeleitete Bedarfsanalyse zur städtischen Bewegungsförderung

Implementing evidence ecosystems in the public health service: Development of a framework for designing tailored training programs

Implementing evidence ecosystems in the public health service: Development of a seven-step framework for designing tailored training programs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About