2019
DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2019.1611174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting a Grip: The PET Framework for Studying How Reader Emotions Influence Comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
7
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that emotion in this study was experimentally induced and not retrospectively self-reported, we predicted that results would be aligned with past research that shows advantageous effects for negative over positive emotions (Bohn-Gettler, 2019). Specifically, we predicted that participants who received negative emotion induction will have superior knowledge revision processes and outcomes demonstrated via fastest reading times and highest post-test scores overall; positive induction will result in the slowest times and lowest scores; and neutral induction will fall in between.…”
Section: Present Researchsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given that emotion in this study was experimentally induced and not retrospectively self-reported, we predicted that results would be aligned with past research that shows advantageous effects for negative over positive emotions (Bohn-Gettler, 2019). Specifically, we predicted that participants who received negative emotion induction will have superior knowledge revision processes and outcomes demonstrated via fastest reading times and highest post-test scores overall; positive induction will result in the slowest times and lowest scores; and neutral induction will fall in between.…”
Section: Present Researchsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Finally, consistent with the PET framework (Bohn-Gettler, 2019), we also expected that the effects of emotion will be stronger in the Refutation-Only condition. Refutations without explanations facilitate co-activation of correct and incorrect information but do not privilege or constrain activation on the correct concept.…”
Section: Present Researchsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we find in Study 1 that most emotions measured by the PANAS are associated with increased belief in fake news and decreased ability to discern between real and fake news, we cannot speak to whether the mechanisms behind these relationships are uniform or vary between emotions. A number of studies detail how different emotions are associated with different processing patterns; for instance, positive emotions may facilitate assimilative processing (i.e., changing external information to fit internal representations), whereas negative emotions may be associated with accommodative processing (i.e., changing internal representations to fit external information; see Fiedler and Beier 2014 ; Bohn-Gettler 2019 ). However, other models of emotional processing posit that both positive and negative emotions may place limitations on cognitive resources if experiencing such emotions is part of a semantic network (Meinhardt and Pekrun 2003 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, most empirical results, especially from studies using eye tracking, are limited to the level of single words or experimentally controlled sentences (Clifton et al, 2007;Radach et al, 2008;Radach and Kennedy, 2013;Wallot et al, 2013). By contrast, reading as one of the essential daily activities commonly involves context information and goes along with emotional processes (e.g., Jacobs, 2011;Mar et al, 2011;Bohn-Gettler, 2019). This leads unavoidably to the second key point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%