Getting a head in hard soils: Convergent skull evolution and divergent allometric patterns explain shape variation in a highly diverse genus of pocket gophers (Thomomys)

Abstract

BackgroundHigh morphological diversity can occur in closely related animals when selection favors morphologies that are subject to intrinsic biological constraints. A good example is subterranean rodents of the genus Thomomys, one of the most taxonomically and morphologically diverse mammalian genera. Highly procumbent, tooth-digging rodent skull shapes are often geometric consequences of increased body size. Indeed, larger-bodied Thomomys species tend to inhabit harder soils. We used geometric morphometric analyses to investigate the interplay between soil hardness (the main extrinsic selection pressure on fossorial mammals) and allometry (i.e. shape change due to size change; generally considered the main intrinsic factor) on crania and humeri in this fast-evolving mammalian clade.ResultsLarger Thomomys species/subspecies tend to have more procumbent cranial shapes with some exceptions, including a small-bodied species inhabiting hard soils. Counter to earlier suggestions, cranial shape within Thomomys does not follow a genus-wide allometric pattern as even regional subpopulations differ in allometric slopes. In contrast, humeral shape varies less with body size and with soil hardness. Soft-soil taxa have larger humeral muscle attachment sites but retain an orthodont (non-procumbent) cranial morphology. In intermediate soils, two pairs of sister taxa diverge through differential modifications on either the humerus or the cranium. In the hardest soils, both humeral and cranial morphology are derived through large muscle attachment sites and a high degree of procumbency.ConclusionsOur results show that conflict between morphological function and intrinsic allometric patterning can quickly and differentially alter the rodent skeleton, especially the skull. In addition, we found a new case of convergent evolution of incisor procumbency among large-, medium-, and small-sized species inhabiting hard soils. This occurs through different combinations of allometric and non-allometric changes, contributing to shape diversity within the genus. The strong influence of allometry on cranial shape appears to confirm suggestions that developmental change underlies mammalian cranial shape divergences, but this requires confirmation from ontogenetic studies. Our findings illustrate how a variety of intrinsic processes, resulting in species-level convergence, could sustain a genus-level range across a variety of extrinsic environments. This might represent a mechanism for observations of genus-level niche conservation despite species extinctions in mammals.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0782-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Out on a limb: bandicoot limb co‐variation suggests complex impacts of development and adaptation on marsupial forelimb evolution

“…Fast local adaptation to soil conditions is common in populations of fossorial mammals (Marcy et al 2016), so that this result is not unexpected. Notably, partial correlation and 2B-PLS results for I. obesulus and P. gunnii have similar signs and significance levels, but their underlying physical manifestations as seen in the 2B-PLS plots are markedly different.…”

“…The evolution of limb adaptation might be very fast, as is suggested by several significant differences in the bone shapes of individuals from different locations. Fast local adaptation to soil conditions is common in populations of fossorial mammals (Marcy et al 2016), so that this result is not unexpected. However, the Procrustes shape differences between left and right radii in I. obesulus and P. gunnii might even hint at individually acquired shapes related to the "handedness" of the animal, an intriguing possibility warranting further research.…”

Postnatal development of the largest subterranean mammal (Bathyergus suillus): Morphology, osteogenesis, and modularity of the appendicular skeleton

“…6 With the exception of few ontogenetic studies mostly focused on cranial anatomy, [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] most of the research assessing the musculoskeletal phenotype of extant and extinct subterranean and fossorial mammals has focused on morphofunctional comparisons of adults only (or at "endpoints" of ontogeny) where most of somatic (and/or skeletal) growth of the individual has been attained. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] In addition, most of these studies have focused on few specimens and have used a particular anatomical dimension for analysis, either their external morphology (2D or 3D) or their bone microanatomy.…”

Shifting spaces: which disparity or dissimilarity metrics best summarise occupancy in multidimensional spaces?

“…Second, in many studies in ecology and evolution, authors have focused on measuring the volume of the trait-space with different metrics (e.g. ellipsoid volume Donohue et al 2013; hypervolume Díaz et al 2016; Procrustes variance Marcy et al 2016; product of variance Wright 2017). However, volume only represents a single aspects of space occupancy, disregarding others such as the density (Harmon et al 2008) or position (Wills 2001; Ciampaglio et al 2001).…”

“…leaf area; Díaz et al 2016) or more sophisticated measures (Fourier ellipses; Bonhomme et al 2014; e.g. landmark position; Marcy et al 2016). Traits can also be measured by using relative observations (e.g.…”