2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10209-008-0133-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting closer: tailored human–computer speech dialog

Abstract: This paper presents an advanced call center, which adapts presentation and interaction strategy to properties of the caller such as age, gender, and emotional state. User studies on interactive voice response (IVR) systems have shown that these properties can be used effectively to ''tailor'' services to users or user groups who do not maintain personal preferences, e.g., because they do not use the service on a regular basis. The adopted approach to achieve individualization of services, without being able to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greatest disadvantage of our approach is that compiling appropriate lexical frequency statistics takes time, whereas systems such as the one discussed by Metze et al [1] use voice features determined from the first response to adapt almost all aspects of the subsequent interaction, including products presented to the user. Although some of the word groups (please, hello) used are likely to occur in the first utterance or two, word groups…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The greatest disadvantage of our approach is that compiling appropriate lexical frequency statistics takes time, whereas systems such as the one discussed by Metze et al [1] use voice features determined from the first response to adapt almost all aspects of the subsequent interaction, including products presented to the user. Although some of the word groups (please, hello) used are likely to occur in the first utterance or two, word groups…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62% of all older users (n=16) and 4.2% of all younger users (n=1) used a Social interaction style. 1…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations