“…Indeed, there have been increased calls for moving beyond post-post-positivistic geospatial research and toward more mixed and qualitative methods (Elwood & Cope, 2009; Lubienski & Lee, 2017; Yoon & Lubienski, 2018), as well as the application of critical perspectives in GIS research (Hogrebe & Tate, 2012; Jabbar et al, 2017; Yoon, Gulson, & Lubienski, 2018). Those calls are now being answered, and more qualitative GIS studies have emerged (Bell, 2007; Jabbar et al, 2017; Yoon, Lubienski, & Lee, 2018), including “participatory GIS” (Dunn, 2007; Elwood, 2006; Weiner & Harris, 2008; Yoon & Lubienski, 2018), those that engage marginalized communities and their members (Ghose & Welcenbach, 2018; Hogrebe & Tate, 2012; Kwan & Ding, 2008), or those that are emancipatory in nature (Sui, 2015). Mixed-method approaches invite both etic and emic perspectives, giving deeper accounts of “place” and pushing GIS research to consider not only multiple ways of knowing but also multiple ontologies.…”