2020
DOI: 10.1111/cup.13682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting CIC of cutaneous soft tissue sarcomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The IHC evaluation of a potential MCC calls for consideration of (a) the clinical context of the case, (b) the immunophenotypic overlap between MCC and some morphological mimics (eg, CD99, as in Ewing's sarcoma; PAX‐5 and TdT, as in lymphomas), 45‐47 (c) the fact that subsets of MCC can yield aberrant IHC profiles (eg, MCPyV‐negative MCCs can share IHC profiles in common with metastatic small cell carcinoma of the lung [SCCL]), 34,48 (d) the relative specificity of IHC stains (eg, the superiority of NF and SATB2 in identifying MCC), 49,50 and (e) the limitations of IHC in this context (eg, Ewing's and Ewing's‐like sarcomas require genetic confirmation) 51,52 . In the final analysis, integration of clinical factors, imaging studies and pathological features of the tumor is necessary to establish a final diagnosis.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The IHC evaluation of a potential MCC calls for consideration of (a) the clinical context of the case, (b) the immunophenotypic overlap between MCC and some morphological mimics (eg, CD99, as in Ewing's sarcoma; PAX‐5 and TdT, as in lymphomas), 45‐47 (c) the fact that subsets of MCC can yield aberrant IHC profiles (eg, MCPyV‐negative MCCs can share IHC profiles in common with metastatic small cell carcinoma of the lung [SCCL]), 34,48 (d) the relative specificity of IHC stains (eg, the superiority of NF and SATB2 in identifying MCC), 49,50 and (e) the limitations of IHC in this context (eg, Ewing's and Ewing's‐like sarcomas require genetic confirmation) 51,52 . In the final analysis, integration of clinical factors, imaging studies and pathological features of the tumor is necessary to establish a final diagnosis.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential diagnosis of a “small blue round cell” tumor in the skin/subcutis includes primary cutaneous neoplasms and metastases 11,12,14 . Apart from MCC, the first category includes (a) non‐neuroendocrine small cell undifferentiated carcinoma, (b) small cell melanoma, (c) cutaneous lymphoma, and (d) small round cell undifferentiated sarcoma (eg, Ewing and Ewing‐like sarcomas, as skillfully outlined in a recent editorial in this journal) 52 . The capacity of some poorly differentiated angiosarcomas to express neuroendocrine markers deserves recognition in this context 55,56 .…”
Section: Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 16 28 36 ] The differential diagnosis includes primary and metastatic neoplasms such as melanomas, lymphomas, other neuroendocrine or nonneuroendocrine small cell undifferentiated carcinomas and sarcomas (particularly cutaneous Ewing's or Ewing’s-like sarcomas). [ 37 ] Of the metastatic tumors in the differential diagnosis, distinction between a deposit of small cell carcinoma of the lung and MCC is the most common diagnostic quandary.…”
Section: H Istopathological Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%