“…The IHC evaluation of a potential MCC calls for consideration of (a) the clinical context of the case, (b) the immunophenotypic overlap between MCC and some morphological mimics (eg, CD99, as in Ewing's sarcoma; PAX‐5 and TdT, as in lymphomas), 45‐47 (c) the fact that subsets of MCC can yield aberrant IHC profiles (eg, MCPyV‐negative MCCs can share IHC profiles in common with metastatic small cell carcinoma of the lung [SCCL]), 34,48 (d) the relative specificity of IHC stains (eg, the superiority of NF and SATB2 in identifying MCC), 49,50 and (e) the limitations of IHC in this context (eg, Ewing's and Ewing's‐like sarcomas require genetic confirmation) 51,52 . In the final analysis, integration of clinical factors, imaging studies and pathological features of the tumor is necessary to establish a final diagnosis.…”