2019
DOI: 10.1177/1932296819842186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting More Information From Glucose Meter Evaluations

Abstract: Glucose meter evaluations are common in publications and inform whether the meter meets the ISO 15197 specification. The ISO 15197 specifications, which are universally cited, leave 1% of results unspecified, which can be thought of as typical performance of results (99%) versus rare performance (1%). Suggestions are provided to extract more information from these evaluations, including rare performance, since highly discrepant results or failure to obtain a result can be observed in a glucose meter that has m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 As mentioned previously, most evaluations use relatively small sample sizes and rarely produce outliers. 4 This does not invalidate the study-rather one can consider the estimated performance to be for typical results. That is, this is the performance one can expect most of the time (eg 95%) with errors caused by imprecision and average bias.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 As mentioned previously, most evaluations use relatively small sample sizes and rarely produce outliers. 4 This does not invalidate the study-rather one can consider the estimated performance to be for typical results. That is, this is the performance one can expect most of the time (eg 95%) with errors caused by imprecision and average bias.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%