2019
DOI: 10.1177/1468794119867548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting more out of interviews. Understanding interviewees’ accounts in relation to their frames of orientation

Abstract: This paper contributes to an ongoing debate about the validity of interview data and the ways in which they are interpreted in the ‘interview society’. We understand the need for an extensive reliance on interviews and, at the same time, recognise the serious limitations that exist regarding access to the interviewee’s worldview, their motivations and orientations. A crucial problem in this regard and the main concern of our paper is how to interpret subjective accounts, such as arguments or everyday theories,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CEB, being a female final year UK General Paediatric Trainee, ensured commonality between paediatric doctors allowing trainees to feel at ease and has elicited a rich data set,12 which may not have been yielded if trainees had to explain the nuances of medicine and PIC 13…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CEB, being a female final year UK General Paediatric Trainee, ensured commonality between paediatric doctors allowing trainees to feel at ease and has elicited a rich data set,12 which may not have been yielded if trainees had to explain the nuances of medicine and PIC 13…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another potentially relevant analytic strategy is to try to distinguish between what a participant does and what he says he does. For example, the documentary method of interpretation (DMI; Philipps & Mrowczynski, 2019) is an analytic approach for uncovering what participants do and what drives their actions (implicit knowledge), which might differ from what they say they do (theoretical knowledge). This might be a useful approach for some Almost Too Incredible Stories; however, only if the problem with the story is a potential deviation between theoretical and implicit knowledge – not if it is told for other reasons or motivations (e.g., the participant’s misinterpretation of a situation, impression management, or for achieving recognition or sympathy).…”
Section: Methodological Issues: Validity Rigour Trustworthiness and I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible, in this phase of analysis, ask questions that could be referred also to the perception of colours, compared to others more traditionally used in airport design, to understand how users perceive copper and how they respond to oxidation states if showed by the material. "Unstructured" interviews -for their inherent qualitative aspects -could be the best way to achieve valuable data from the aesthetic and design perception perspective [23,24].…”
Section: Research Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%