2017
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201797176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting stress out of stressed‐out stress granules

Abstract: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) pathology is linked to the aberrant aggregation of specific proteins, including TDP‐43, FUS, and SOD1, but it is not clear why these aggregation events cause ALS. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Mateju et al (2017) report a direct link between misfolded proteins accumulating in stress granules and the phase transition of these stress granules from liquid to solid. This discovery provides a model connecting protein aggregation to stress granule dysfunction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that the aggregation of TDP‐43 proteins alters the cell's response to stress by two pathways; disrupting mRNA sorting in the cells, required for proper processing and decay, due to massive fibrillary aggregates, and by causing stress granules persistence even after stress resolution. Recently, it was demonstrated that the first steps of ALS pathology are a result of protein misfolding and aggregation that influence the structural properties of stress granules . Specifically, this study has shown that over time misfolded proteins, such as ALS‐linked variants of SOD1, taint the composition of normal stress granules, which in turn leads to the assembly of stress granules with altered and abnormal physical properties.…”
Section: Mrnas Stress Granules and Diseasementioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been proposed that the aggregation of TDP‐43 proteins alters the cell's response to stress by two pathways; disrupting mRNA sorting in the cells, required for proper processing and decay, due to massive fibrillary aggregates, and by causing stress granules persistence even after stress resolution. Recently, it was demonstrated that the first steps of ALS pathology are a result of protein misfolding and aggregation that influence the structural properties of stress granules . Specifically, this study has shown that over time misfolded proteins, such as ALS‐linked variants of SOD1, taint the composition of normal stress granules, which in turn leads to the assembly of stress granules with altered and abnormal physical properties.…”
Section: Mrnas Stress Granules and Diseasementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Stress granules are not cytoplasmic precipitates, and in fact have the physical properties of liquid droplets, which form by a liquid–liquid phase separation process . It has therefore been recently suggested that the physiological roles of stress granules are connected to their material and biophysical properties .…”
Section: The Formation Of Stress Granulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we asked whether the inclusions formed by Sod1 were localized in stress granules (SG), and costained cells with an antibody against G3BP, an established marker of SGs [ 23 , 24 ]. We found that none of the inclusions formed by the hSod1 mutants tested in this study colocalized with G3BP (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still unclear whether Sod1 inclusions are toxic, and additional studies using different model systems will be instrumental to address this. Recent studies have connected protein inclusions with SGs [ 24 ]. Using spinal cord motor neurons [ 40 ] or HeLa cells as models [ 23 ], it was shown that inclusions formed by G93A and A4V Sod1 mutants colocalize with G3BP, an established marker of SGs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even more intriguing, CHX-resistant granules were present already at the rescue. This data suggests that the FUS/TIA-R-positive SGs have switched from a liquid-to-solid phase, evolving toward stable SG-derived inclusions ( Siwach and Kaganovich, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%