In a new study, Schwartz and colleagues have investigated the best way to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children. Having already improved GFR estimation with the use of creatinine-based equations, the investigators now propose a more precise method for cystatin C measurement. The precision of a GFR equation will strongly depend on the analytical precision of the biological variables included.In children with chronic kidney disease, measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best indicator of global kidney function. 1 Because measuring GFR remains relatively cumbersome and costly, however, estimating GFR using renal biomarkers remains relevant for daily practice. In 1976, Schwartz et al. proposed an equation where the parameter height/serum creatinine was multiplied by a constant (k) to estimate creatinine clearance. 2 This original Schwartz equation has been popular for several decades, but was based on the colourimetric Jaffe creatinine measurement method. Measuring serum creatinine levels by a precise and reproducible method is especially important in children because their mean serum concentrations are lower than those in adults and are thus more prone to interferences, for example from proteins present in the serum. Therefore, it is now recommended that serum creatinine levels should be measured by enzymatic methods in children. 3 "By optimizing the measurements of cystatin C, they improve the estimation of GFR in children..."Changing from the Jaffe method to enzymatic methods had a large impact on the k value in the original Schwartz equation. 3,4 In 2009, Schwartz et al. recalculated the k value of the estimating equation to be used with the enzymatic method and plasma iohexol clearance measurement as a reference method to assess GFR. 4 The fact that most of the enzymatic methods available in 2012 are isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)-traceable means that an identical equation can be used in all laboratories, which is very important from a practical point of view 5 However, a limitation of the 2009 study was that the equation was not validated in an independent validation cohort. In the same publication, the researchers studied the performance of the new renal biomarker cystatin C. In contrast to prior studies, Schwartz and colleagues demonstrated that cystatin C was less predictive of measured GFR than was height/serum creatinine, which resulted in a less powerful cystatin C exponent in the final equation compared with height/serum creatinine. This final equation included other variables such as blood urea nitrogen (BUN), height and sex. 4 One major issue was the turbidimetric method used to measure cystatin C, which has later been demonstrated as relatively imprecise.In 2012, Schwartz and colleagues studied children included in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) study in order to determine the best way to estimate GFR. 6 Only individuals aged between 1 year and 16 years with an initial estimated GFR of 30-60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (by the original Schwartz equati...