2015
DOI: 10.1109/lwc.2015.2476460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GFSK Demodulation Using Sequential Monte Carlo Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outputs of the simulation, algorithm behaviour, and performance metrics underwent meticulous data analysis using Matlab/Simulink designed code and model Ref. [5] . This analysis provided valuable insights into the algorithm's dynamic response, accuracy, and efficiency across a spectrum of scenarios.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The outputs of the simulation, algorithm behaviour, and performance metrics underwent meticulous data analysis using Matlab/Simulink designed code and model Ref. [5] . This analysis provided valuable insights into the algorithm's dynamic response, accuracy, and efficiency across a spectrum of scenarios.…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation was conducted using Matlab/Simulink on a computer equipped with a Core i7 processor and the Win10 operating system. The methodology of the algorithm consisted of using recursive Bayesian, specifically, sequential Monte Carlo technique (SMC) to predict the next best duty cycle for the Boost converter to generate the maximum power point for each instance of time [5] . Furthermore, the system's effectiveness was confirmed through validation both under standard test conditions (STC) and varying weather conditions of irradiance, temperature, and partial shading (simple, moderate, severe, and dynamic shadings).…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several GFSK demodulation structures and algorithms proposed in the literature; see for instance [31] and references therein. In the context of Bluetooth, most of then adopt non-coherent detection due to the need for low cost devices, for satisfactory performance with the frequency-hopping scheme, and to cope with different modulation indexes.…”
Section: B Gaussian Frequency-shift Keying (Gfsk)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High performance penalties also may result if h is small, since this situation reduces the ability of discriminating the frequency shifts in the received signal. To improve performance, the phase-shift discriminator, or any other demodulation processes, often requires to be complemented with some sort of subsequent detection algorithm [31]. The optimum one, in the sense of minimizing the probability of deciding in favor of a wrong symbol sequence, is the maximum likelihood sequence detection (MLSD) [32].…”
Section: B Gaussian Frequency-shift Keying (Gfsk)mentioning
confidence: 99%