2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GGA+U study on phase transition, optoelectronic and magnetic properties of AmO2 with spin–orbit coupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For half-filled 5f electronic systems, the strong Coulomb repulsion effect as well as the relativistic effect of SOC are both critical in obtaining reasonable electronic structures. This fact has been well established in many actinide dioxides and hydrides [5,6,17,19,20,22,26,61,66,67]. For our present system CmO 2 , although there are no experimental results to compare, the effects of strong Coulomb repulsion and SOC should be considered [5,6].…”
Section: B Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For half-filled 5f electronic systems, the strong Coulomb repulsion effect as well as the relativistic effect of SOC are both critical in obtaining reasonable electronic structures. This fact has been well established in many actinide dioxides and hydrides [5,6,17,19,20,22,26,61,66,67]. For our present system CmO 2 , although there are no experimental results to compare, the effects of strong Coulomb repulsion and SOC should be considered [5,6].…”
Section: B Electronic Structurementioning
confidence: 70%
“…In the present work, we only study the ground-state fluorite phase. Since the magnetic structure of CmO 2 is still unclear in experiments [30] and most actinide dioxides stable as (100) AFM state [19,20,[60][61][62], we should consider the NM, FM, and (100) AFM configurations in our following study. For simplicity, we label (100) AFM as AFM.…”
Section: A Structure and Magnetic Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is no explicit calculation of these parameters in order to validate the Kotani values. As a result, the literature does not agree on any value of U and J, since the values used in the early first-principles study strongly vary from one author to another [7,[13][14][15].…”
Section: Bulk Properties Of Amomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the onsite Coulomb interaction U and exchange J are well known for UO 2 [11,12], this is not the case for americium oxides, for which literature does not agree on any value since these values strongly vary from one author to another [7,[13][14][15]. Actinide oxides have been extensively studied by the DFT+U [12,[16][17][18] method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%