Ghost London

Laing, Morna

doi:10.5040/9781474260428-fpa035

Cited by 2 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Figure 6.11 compares the difference in real income growth at the 10 th and 90 th percentiles when incomes are deflated by the CPI (labelled 'Before adjusting for inflation difference') and when they are deflated by income-group-specific inflation rates (labelled 'After adjusting for inflation difference'). 9 When all incomes are deflated by the CPI, the fall in real incomes between 2007-08 and 2013-14 was 6.3 percentage points smaller at the Figure 6.11. Difference in real income growth experienced by the 10 th percentile compared with the 90 th percentile since 2007-08…”

Section: Differences In Real Incomementioning

confidence: 92%

“…8 Others argue the opposite, asserting that fiscal contractions actually boost the economy in the long run, as a wider berth is given to the private sector to grow, or that the increased confidence from lower borrowing stimulates activity. 9 In the absence of conclusive evidence, the OBR has decided to use an assumption of zero effect in the long run, but it is important not to forget that this debate exists.…”

Section: Provisional (After Next Election)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The tax increases introduced as part of the government's fiscal consolidation plan have typically been announced with some discussion of the characteristics of the losers from the reforms, and much repeated rhetoric about 'ensuring those with the broadest shoulders bear the largest burden'. 9 However, there has been little attention paid to the changing composition of total revenues and the effect this might have on the cyclicality and volatility of revenues, both of which are important for stability in the public finances.…”

Section: Long-run Volatility Of Receiptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The OBR's analysis of the UK economy 8 has consistently identified total factor productivity as being the most important source of any permanent loss of potential output, an argument that is also advanced by Dicks (2010). 9 The arguments in favour of this theory generally centre on lower levels of innovation and research & development (R&D). This is generally caused by a lack of bank funding, resulting from a reduction of risk appetite or from forbearance on outstanding lending which prevents the reallocation of capital to more productive activities.…”

Section: Total Factor Productivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…London has seen a stronger recovery than any other region. 9 Most indices suggest nominal house prices in London are above their pre-recession peak. They were 9% above their previous peak in 2013Q3 according to Nationwide, 11% above according to the Land Registry in September 2013, and 19% above according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in 2013Q3.…”

Section: London and Northern Ireland Are Two Exceptions To The Overalmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

IFS Green Budget 2014

Emmerson¹,

Johnson²,

Miller³

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Professor David Rhind CBE FRS FBA Chairman of the Trustees of the Nuffield FoundationThe Nuffield Foundation is an endowed charitable trust that aims to improve social wellbeing in the widest sense. It funds research and innovation in education and social policy and also works to build capacity in education, science and social science research. The Nuffield Foundation has funded this project, but the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation. More information is available at http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org.Welcome to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS)'s 2014 Green Budget. In the following pages, we discuss some of the many issues confronting Chancellor George Osborne as he prepares his fifth Budget. Despite the relatively positive recent data, with growth increasing and unemployment falling, the largest challenge for the Chancellor remains having to contend with the consequences of the Great Recession for the public finances and household incomes.In this book, we examine in detail some of the key risks to the Chancellor's plans for reducing the deficit. We set out in detail what has been happening in the housing market and the role of government policies aimed, at least in part, at boosting homeownership. We also document what has been happening to incomes across the distribution and compare this with the rates of inflation that different types of households have been facing. We examine how the UK energy market operates, and discuss in detail policy options for increasing state support for childcare, improving the taxation of private pensions and reforming business rates.As ever, we collaborate with others to write the macroeconomic chapters. We are grateful to Oxford Economics, and in particular to Andrew Goodwin, Oliver Salmon and Adam Slater, for the chapters they have contributed on the outlook for the UK economy and the global economy. This year we offer our particular thanks to the Nuffield Foundation for the funding it has provided to support the Green Budget. Our most important aim for the Green Budget is to influence policy and inform the public debate. It is particularly appropriate then that it should be supported by the Nuffield Foundation, for which these are also central aims.We are also extremely grateful for the continuing support that ESRC provides for our ongoing research work via the Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy at IFS. This underpins all our analysis in this volume.

show abstract

Section: Differences In Real Incomementioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Provisional (After Next Election)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Long-run Volatility Of Receiptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Total Factor Productivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: London and Northern Ireland Are Two Exceptions To The Overalmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

IFS Green Budget 2014

Emmerson¹,

Johnson²,

Miller³

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Piloting of a minimum data set for older people living in care homes in England: protocol for a longitudinal, mixed-methods study

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionHealth and care data are routinely collected about care home residents in England, yet there is no way to collate these data to inform benchmarking and improvement. The Developing research resources And minimum data set for Care Homes’ Adoption and use study has developed a prototype minimum data set (MDS) for piloting.Methods and analysisA mixed-methods longitudinal pilot study will be conducted in 60 care homes (approximately 960 residents) in 3 regions of England, using resident data from cloud-based digital care home records at two-time points. These will be linked to resident and care home level data held within routine National Health Service and social care data sets. Two rounds of focus groups with care home staff (n=8–10 per region) and additional interviews with external stakeholders (n=3 per region) will explore implementation and the perceived utility of the MDS. Data will be assessed for completeness and timeliness of completion. Descriptive statistics, including percentage floor and ceiling effects, will establish data quality. For validated scales, construct validity will be assessed by hypothesis testing and exploratory factor analysis will establish structural validity. Internal consistency will be established using Cronbach’s alpha. Longitudinal analysis of the pilot data will demonstrate the value of the MDS to each region. Qualitative data will be analysed inductively using thematic analysis to understand the complexities of implementing an MDS in care homes for older people.Ethics and disseminationThe study has received ethical approval from the London Queen’s Square Research Ethics Committee (22/LO/0250). Informed consent is required for participation. Findings will be disseminated to: academics working on data use and integration in social care, care sector organisations, policy makers and commissioners. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Partner NIHR Applied Research Collaborations, the National Care Forum and the British Geriatrics Society will disseminate policy briefs.

show abstract

Ghost London

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

IFS Green Budget 2014

IFS Green Budget 2014

Piloting of a minimum data set for older people living in care homes in England: protocol for a longitudinal, mixed-methods study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About