1958
DOI: 10.1097/00005072-195807000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Giant-Cell Arteritis Involving Small Meningeal and Intracerebral Vessels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One problem is that the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis was not confirmed bioptically in all published cases. Therefore in some papers an isolated granuloma tous angiitis of the CNS could be assumed [4,5,22,23]. Further, etiologic relationships between arteritis tempo ralis and brain infarction seem to be unclear in some reported patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One problem is that the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis was not confirmed bioptically in all published cases. Therefore in some papers an isolated granuloma tous angiitis of the CNS could be assumed [4,5,22,23]. Further, etiologic relationships between arteritis tempo ralis and brain infarction seem to be unclear in some reported patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first microscopic description was by Horton, Magath, and Brown (1932). Definitive surveys of the patho- logical findings at biopsy and necropsy have been published by several workers (Harrison, 1948;Heptinstall et al, 1954;McCormick and Neuberger, 1958). The gross features of the disease are not characteristic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Definitive histological studies of giant-cell (temporal) arteritis have been published by several workers (Harrison, 1948;Heptinstall, Porter, and Barkley, 1954;McCormick and Neuberger, 1958). The lesions are fairly uniform and have involved all layers of many different arteries and veins-large and small, intracranial as well as extracranial.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] In 1988, Calabrese and Mallek 5 suggested diagnostic criteria for PCNSV that included development of a neurological deficit unexplained by other processes, an angiogram with characteristic features of vasculitis, or a central nervous system (CNS) biopsy specimen showing vasculitis. Because of the more invasive nature of CNS biopsy, angiography has become preferred for evaluating patients with suggestive symptoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%